It boggles my mind that it has been 10 years since California passed medical mj laws. There are still a handful of patients receiving their cans full of joints rolled with so/so pot from the feds every month. If it was so harmful would the feds still be sending it out to those folks who were approved to take it back when the feds did look into it? The Dutch are still the only ones who have it right. The Canadians seem to have some good laws, but there is still so much controvery up there that folks still are not safe. Safer, but not safe!
Buffalo Bill Reviewed by Buffalo Bill on . Medicinal use YES OR NO Marijuana: Yes or no to medicinal use? The Tartan Online Pittsburgh, PA May 3, 2006 -- The use of marijuana for medical purposes has been debated for many years. While some consider the plant to be a phenomenal ailment reliever, others believe that the psychoactive and harmful effects overpower the possible benefits. In the most recent chain of events, on April 20, the FDA rejected medical use for marijuana. Although a number of states have passed legislation allowing for marijuana to be Rating: 5