Medicinal use YES OR NO

[Buggsy]

Marijuana: Yes or no to medicinal use?
The Tartan Online
Pittsburgh, PA May 3, 2006 -- The use of marijuana for medical purposes has been debated for many years. While some consider the plant to be a phenomenal ailment reliever, others believe that the psychoactive and harmful effects overpower the possible benefits. In the most recent chain of events, on April 20, the FDA rejected medical use for marijuana. Although a number of states have passed legislation allowing for marijuana to be used medically, the FDA says that these laws are inconsistent with the new rulings.

Canada has taken a different route from the U.S., however, and has allowed for medical testing and prescription use of the substance. Canadian researchers have recently discovered that marijuana can cause the neurons in the brain to regenerate.

Marijuana has been on the medical scene in the US since the beginning of the 19th century. Doctors recommended that it should be sold over the counter as a pain reliever, but it soon lost popularity with the development of aspirin. In 1937, Congress passed the Marijuana Tax Act, which eventually led to use of the substance being criminalized. The American Medical Association was the solitary opponent to this legislative step. Since that time, marijuana has been outlawed by the federal government and has been banned for medicinal use.

In the 1960s, marijuana was found to reduce intra-ocular (internal eye) pressure and helped patients with glaucoma, helping to prevent blindness. It was also found to eliminate the nausea experienced during cancer chemotherapy. Lastly, marijuana was found to control muscle spasms associated with spinal cord injury.

The part of marijuana that is responsible for the â??highâ?� condition associated with the drug was found to be delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC. The chemical compound was isolated, approved by the FDA, and sold under the name Marinol. Marinol had too many side effects and was too expensive for the common person. Smoking marijuana also immediately releases THC into the blood stream, while taking a capsule took an hour before relief was finally felt.

In 1996, California permitted patients to use marijuana for medical purposes. This led to political contradictions because a state law conflicted with a federal law. The public disagreed with laws that restricted patientsâ?? use of marijuana. The federal government then decided to modify their policies. They did not change their perspective on outlawing marijuana, but allowed for more marijuana research in order to better understand its effects.

The reliability of medicinal marijuana research has been questioned. This is because an effective placebo for marijuana cannot be created, as traditional research methods require. A placebo is an inactive substance that is given as a control and has no therapeutic effects. Using humans as subjects, two groups would have to be created, one that received marijuana and one that did not. The psychoactive properties of marijuana cannot be replicated in a placebo, and thus prevents such an experiment from being conducted.

The debate and controversy surrounding the use of medicinal marijuana is expected to continue until a successful compromise between researchers and proponents is reached.


Be good, peace and many kudos

Buggsy Reviewed by Buggsy on 06-12-2006. Medicinal use YES OR NO Marijuana: Yes or no to medicinal use? The Tartan Online Pittsburgh, PA May 3, 2006 -- The use of marijuana for medical purposes has been debated for many years. While some consider the plant to be a phenomenal ailment reliever, others believe that the psychoactive and harmful effects overpower the possible benefits. In the most recent chain of events, on April 20, the FDA rejected medical use for marijuana. Although a number of states have passed legislation allowing for marijuana to be Rating: 5

[imagoober]

Interesting read! i say yes of course!:thumbsup:

[braddog10]

Marijuana: Yes or no to medicinal use?
The Tartan Online
Pittsburgh, PA May 3, 2006 -- The use of marijuana for medical purposes has been debated for many years. While some consider the plant to be a phenomenal ailment reliever, others believe that the psychoactive and harmful effects overpower the possible benefits. In the most recent chain of events, on April 20, the FDA rejected medical use for marijuana. Although a number of states have passed legislation allowing for marijuana to be used medically, the FDA says that these laws are inconsistent with the new rulings.

Canada has taken a different route from the U.S., however, and has allowed for medical testing and prescription use of the substance. Canadian researchers have recently discovered that marijuana can cause the neurons in the brain to regenerate.

Marijuana has been on the medical scene in the US since the beginning of the 19th century. Doctors recommended that it should be sold over the counter as a pain reliever, but it soon lost popularity with the development of aspirin. In 1937, Congress passed the Marijuana Tax Act, which eventually led to use of the substance being criminalized. The American Medical Association was the solitary opponent to this legislative step. Since that time, marijuana has been outlawed by the federal government and has been banned for medicinal use.

In the 1960s, marijuana was found to reduce intra-ocular (internal eye) pressure and helped patients with glaucoma, helping to prevent blindness. It was also found to eliminate the nausea experienced during cancer chemotherapy. Lastly, marijuana was found to control muscle spasms associated with spinal cord injury.

The part of marijuana that is responsible for the â??highâ?� condition associated with the drug was found to be delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC. The chemical compound was isolated, approved by the FDA, and sold under the name Marinol. Marinol had too many side effects and was too expensive for the common person. Smoking marijuana also immediately releases THC into the blood stream, while taking a capsule took an hour before relief was finally felt.

In 1996, California permitted patients to use marijuana for medical purposes. This led to political contradictions because a state law conflicted with a federal law. The public disagreed with laws that restricted patientsâ?? use of marijuana. The federal government then decided to modify their policies. They did not change their perspective on outlawing marijuana, but allowed for more marijuana research in order to better understand its effects.

The reliability of medicinal marijuana research has been questioned. This is because an effective placebo for marijuana cannot be created, as traditional research methods require. A placebo is an inactive substance that is given as a control and has no therapeutic effects. Using humans as subjects, two groups would have to be created, one that received marijuana and one that did not. The psychoactive properties of marijuana cannot be replicated in a placebo, and thus prevents such an experiment from being conducted.

The debate and controversy surrounding the use of medicinal marijuana is expected to continue until a successful compromise between researchers and proponents is reached.


Be good, peace and many kudos

Buggsy,

Four or five years ago, I found myself getting dragged down by chronic pain. At times I could only work every other day. If I tried to have a full active day, I found that I could do very little to nothing the next.

On my search for relief of chronic pain, I went to many med sites. a topical search for chronic pain found many studies. The site that most impressed me was webmd. I subscribed to the topic "chronic Pain" to receive any new reports that would come up on their site. One day in my email I received a link to a page "Many Dr's. are seeing relief for chronic pain sufferers thru Med. Marijuana use." This started my search in this area, for I desperately needed the same.

Other sites I had visited also had links for suicide intervention... I understand this well. At one point, depressed, in pain constantly. I was close to feeling.........Done. Tho I certainly wouldn't consider such.

As I went back to the site after noticing your thread. I read that it has far fewer side affects, if any, than nsaids, opiates, other antinflamitories, all of which address liver issues etc...

I'll never forget watching a television program, where a medical examiner had gone to a home, to find a man ~ dressed in his nice cloths, room all nice and straight, laid back on his bed. The very thoughtful woman (ME), was looking him over, observed the gun, the sml cal hole thru the back of his throat. Her comment that he had been dealing with health issues the last several years.

I'll never forget the sinking feeling I had when I saw that. Its' like I knew the man, and exactly where he had been.

Their are estimates that chronic pain cost the country 61.2 Billion dollars per year. M.weed addresses the specific issues without alot of collateral effects.

One article indicated that M.weed directly addresses the physiological issues that are indicated for seizures, bipolar. No wonder so many bipolars like it. Interestingly, Bi-polars are typically prescribed seizure meds.

An interesting read. http://www.webmd.com/content/article/73/81986.htm

I think I typed it in right. If problem, go to webmd, perform search for medicinal marijuana. After reading just a few, Its hard to not get pissed at the AMA.

The relief I enjoy is immediate. My personal Dr., whom I had been seeing for chronic pain, Lite up with interest after I had mentioned my own experience.

By the way, Tho I feel a bit shielded (legally), by my own documented pain history, encompassing 10 of thousands. I realize that I must incorporate more anonymity here for those that I have been in more direct contact with that....... are not.

Sorry guys, a bit of a lose cannon
Think I'll just stick with the boards.

[beachguy in thongs]

Ahhh, fuck aspirin.

[ThatTokenWhiteGuy]

Medicinal use... YES. Marijuana is a hell of a drug, if it can help people with health problems than all the power to it.

[Purple Banana]

I have fibromyalgia (chronic pain disorder), and have had it for 4 years, so I know of what Braddog is talking about. I HATED taking other drugs for pain, both antidepressants that claimed they would work, but didn't, and opiates, which left me feeling icky and becoming addicted. I work as a nursing tech in the ER, and I see what narcotics do to people. Combined with herb and exercise (I eat it to avoid carcinogens, and I'm too cheap to buy a vaporizer) my pain is about a 75% reduction to what it used to be. I used to never even get out of bed because just putting on clothing hurt. Now I can live my life to what I want to, regardless of what AMA thinks.

I had one elderly patient come in one day for chest pains, and I asked the "do you use recreational drugs" question, he said "No, but I do grow it for teenagers in my farm, and I make great profit from it. Does that count?" I nearly DIED laughing, and so did he.

I made good friends with that man, and he ALWAYS gives a discount because of that day.

Cannabis is NOT the evil. More people abuse RX drugs and end up in the slums than from cannabis.

[Dutch Masta]

No. None of us have any need for it and it doesen't improve upon any current medical treatment available. Everyone who smoked marijuana, does it to get high, plain and simple.

Anyone actually expecting to legalize marijuana based off medical uses are in for a huge disappointment. Its not going to happen and the DEA has already made that pretty clear.. Thats not to say I agree with them AT ALL, but their authority far outweighs the illegal pot smoking community.

Now on the other hand, a benefit of information about medical marijuana, leads to an enlightened view on the "drug", rather than a lot of the previous marijuana propoganda going around in the past. This helps to get a good word around for the herb, as majority rules, and as soon as such a high amount of the population smokes it, then serious things will start changing since it will finally be accepted in society.

[BloodAngel]

I smoked a joint and sat in a hottub for a bit and my back pain (so bad I couldn't move) went right away..

[iamafridge]

coming from someone recovering with a fracture I say that medical marijuana should be legalised! it helps with the pain immensely, much better than crappy painkillers

[daima]

Marijuana: Yes or no to medicinal use?
The Tartan Online
Pittsburgh, PA May 3, 2006 -- The use of marijuana for medical purposes has been debated for many years. While some consider the plant to be a phenomenal ailment reliever, others believe that the psychoactive and harmful effects overpower the possible benefits. In the most recent chain of events, on April 20, the FDA rejected medical use for marijuana. Although a number of states have passed legislation allowing for marijuana to be used medically, the FDA says that these laws are inconsistent with the new rulings.

Canada has taken a different route from the U.S., however, and has allowed for medical testing and prescription use of the substance. Canadian researchers have recently discovered that marijuana can cause the neurons in the brain to regenerate.

Marijuana has been on the medical scene in the US since the beginning of the 19th century. Doctors recommended that it should be sold over the counter as a pain reliever, but it soon lost popularity with the development of aspirin. In 1937, Congress passed the Marijuana Tax Act, which eventually led to use of the substance being criminalized. The American Medical Association was the solitary opponent to this legislative step. Since that time, marijuana has been outlawed by the federal government and has been banned for medicinal use.

In the 1960s, marijuana was found to reduce intra-ocular (internal eye) pressure and helped patients with glaucoma, helping to prevent blindness. It was also found to eliminate the nausea experienced during cancer chemotherapy. Lastly, marijuana was found to control muscle spasms associated with spinal cord injury.

The part of marijuana that is responsible for the â??highâ?� condition associated with the drug was found to be delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC. The chemical compound was isolated, approved by the FDA, and sold under the name Marinol. Marinol had too many side effects and was too expensive for the common person. Smoking marijuana also immediately releases THC into the blood stream, while taking a capsule took an hour before relief was finally felt.

In 1996, California permitted patients to use marijuana for medical purposes. This led to political contradictions because a state law conflicted with a federal law. The public disagreed with laws that restricted patientsâ?? use of marijuana. The federal government then decided to modify their policies. They did not change their perspective on outlawing marijuana, but allowed for more marijuana research in order to better understand its effects.

The reliability of medicinal marijuana research has been questioned. This is because an effective placebo for marijuana cannot be created, as traditional research methods require. A placebo is an inactive substance that is given as a control and has no therapeutic effects. Using humans as subjects, two groups would have to be created, one that received marijuana and one that did not. The psychoactive properties of marijuana cannot be replicated in a placebo, and thus prevents such an experiment from being conducted.

The debate and controversy surrounding the use of medicinal marijuana is expected to continue until a successful compromise between researchers and proponents is reached.


Be good, peace and many kudos

10,000 years of human consumption, for reasons from , Religious, Medical, Recreation, and zero overdose deaths. The verdict is in, and it's been in.

dai*ma:stoned: sfca

"After reviewing evidence presented to me by both sides of the medical marijuana issue, i have concluded that marijuana is one of the safest medicines known to man"
-DEA Judge, Francis Young (reagan appointee)