Results 1 to 10 of 77
-
06-05-2006, 04:58 PM #1OPMember
The Draft
Now what are we all going to do when America attacks Iran and then they have a draft?? You don't expect me to go fight in the name of global empire!
Pennsterdam Reviewed by Pennsterdam on . The Draft Now what are we all going to do when America attacks Iran and then they have a draft?? You don't expect me to go fight in the name of global empire! Rating: 5
-
06-05-2006, 07:51 PM #2Senior Member
The Draft
many of those drafted will work for the homeland security dictatorship running checkpoints, monitoring cameras. the new economy is surveillance, police state and prisons...because turning into soviet russia or nazi germany will keep us safe from the freedom hating evil muslims who hate freedom.
what on earth is wrong with you? don't you understand that destroying what our country is and getting rid of freedom will actually protect and give us more freedom?
-
06-05-2006, 08:34 PM #3Senior Member
The Draft
LOL...all the attack would be about is taking out their nuclear capabilities. But of course we ARE the evil empire looking to snatch up the worlds oil...right?
-
06-05-2006, 10:29 PM #4OPMember
The Draft
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
-
06-05-2006, 10:32 PM #5Senior Member
The Draft
Originally Posted by Pennsterdam
n.
A Jewish movement that arose in the late 19th century in response to growing anti-Semitism and sought to reestablish a Jewish homeland in Palestine. Modern Zionism is concerned with the support and development of the state of Israel.
O.K. Guess we could allow the Arab world to push them into the sea. Hell, lets all do a goose step at the same time!
-
06-06-2006, 02:57 AM #6Senior Member
The Draft
How many times do we have to bitchslap these threads by introducing reality. The truth is the draft bills (there were 2) were sponsored and co-sponsored by democraps to try and blame Bush for a non-existant and unwanted draft. Have you heard of a canard? That's what these draft threads are. Propagandized much?
-
06-06-2006, 05:27 AM #7Senior Member
The Draft
Restoring the Draft: The Universal National Service Act of 2006
by Michel Chossudovsky
May 30, 2006
GlobalResearch.ca
Congressman Charles Rangel, a Democrat (NY), introduced on 14 February 2006 a bill in the US Congress which requires:
"all persons in the United States, including women, between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform a [two year] period of military service or a period of civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, and for other purposes."
The bill applies to both US citizens and non-citizens, to men and women. There does not appear to be a provision which would exempt women who are pregnant and/or caring for infants/children in a young age.
While there was some media coverage of Rangel's initiative prior to the formal introduction of the bill, the matter has not been mentioned by the US media since it was introduced in February. There has been a deafening silence: since February 2006, not a single article or editorial has appeared in print on the Universal National Service Act of 2006.
Neither has it been the object of public debate. The bill has been referred to the House Armed Services Committee and the Subcommittee on Military Personnel. Ironically, in previous discussion leading up the bill, Rangel's initiative to restore the draft was described as "an anti-war tactic".
"Rangel opposes war with Iraq and seeks to make the point that many soldiers are volunteers from low-income and minority families. Political leaders, his reasoning goes, would think twice about sending into war the sons and daughters of a more complete cross-section of America. But whether or not one agrees with Rangel's rationale, many Americans would agree that universal service can be a great leveler and a unifying force in society."
Despite Rangel's antiwar resolve, the bill supports Washington's stated objective to extend the war into new frontiers and to ultmately send an entire generation of young Americans to fight an illegal, and unjust war. It is worth noting in this regard that the Neoconservative Project for a New American Century calls for increasing active duty strength from 1.4 to 1.6 million.
The bill also supports Big Brother. Those who are not sent overseas to the war theater would, according to the clauses of the bill, be inducted into the civilian homeland defense corps and other civilian duties, including the Citizens Corps, the "Neighborhood Watch Teams" and the "Volunteer Police Service" established in partnership with local law enforcement. (see http://www.citizencorps.gov/pdf/council.pdf )
While there is at present significant opposition to the bill on both sides of the House, the US military is overextended and lacks the manpower to carry out its global war agenda. This shortage of military personnel is blatantly obvious in Iraq, where the occupation forces are meeting fierce resistance.
The situation regarding the draft could also change if the war were to be extended into Iran. In which case, the substance of this bill could indeed be adopted to meet the manpower requirements of the US military.
History of the Bill
This is the second time Rep. Charles Rangel introduces his controversial bill.
In January 2003, HR 163 was submitted in the House.
It was voted upon and defeated in the House in October 2003, on the grounds that it had not been sent for committee hearings. However, it was suggested at the time that the Republican-controlled House wanted to defeat the bill, to squash rumors that Bush would reintroduce the draft if reelected.
"In spite of adamant denial of draft rumors, Internet and campus campaigners had trumpeted the bill as evidence of a "secret plan" to reinstate the draft in case President Bush is re-elected."
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...articleId=2535
-
06-06-2006, 05:55 AM #8OPMember
The Draft
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
I chastise the Arabs for not seeing the true meaning of Islam yet. Because they take their religion again to an extreme, they will not tolerate the 'people of the Book (Jews)'. But the ones who want to return to Israel take Torah and the prophets way too seriously to an extreme, so they are both held in contempt. Blood could probably have not been spilled if the Illuminati had not created a State for them taking away Palestinian land. If both religions can learn to embrace a more spiritual non dogmatic path, than the Jews and Muslims will truly be called Sons of Abraham.
-
06-06-2006, 07:59 AM #9Senior Member
The Draft
Oh, my bad. I didn't realize this was an anti-semitic, jew/Bush bashing thread. The illuminati conspiracy theory that was thrown in provided a nice touch for illusion. The tin-foil hat crowd never fail to entertain but I could do without the typical "blame the jews for everything" deal that liberals tend to do.
Again, there will be no draft...
Hope that helps
-
06-06-2006, 12:31 PM #10Senior Member
The Draft
Yeah it will proberly get to that point where bush will have to draft people if he starts a war with Iran god how many soilders can the yanks have?.Its already hard for them to recruit new members to fight in Iraq so I don't know how he is going to achieve this.
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
NFL Draft
By Psycho4Bud in forum Sports TalkReplies: 1Last Post: 04-29-2008, 07:48 PM -
A Draft
By TOOL9 in forum PoliticsReplies: 14Last Post: 07-16-2007, 08:50 PM -
NFL Draft!
By Psycho4Bud in forum Sports TalkReplies: 35Last Post: 05-02-2007, 08:41 PM -
and then there was a draft...
By Gumby in forum PoliticsReplies: 0Last Post: 05-11-2006, 03:00 PM -
The Draft
By Libertarian Toker in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 3Last Post: 08-03-2004, 11:48 PM