MSNBC No marijuana link to lung cancer

[Ganjasaurusrex]

www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12943013/


If link doesnt highlight use search box.

Ganjasaurusrex Reviewed by Ganjasaurusrex on 06-03-2006. MSNBC No marijuana link to lung cancer www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12943013/ If link doesnt highlight use search box. Rating: 5

[CBsDankNugs]

wow thats pretty sweet. now finally people might realize that pot isnt worse then cigs.

[benagain]

Fuck Yea :thumbsup: Good news. Everyone has known it but no one wanted to admit it. Allthough theres still tar and shit in any kind of smoke (paper, weed, sawdust) theres not as much shit in weed as tobacco in cigs. Smoking too much weed at once can be a bitch on your lungs, but as with all good things, use in moderation is allways the best way to go

[beachguy in thongs]

wow thats pretty sweet. now finally people might realize that pot isnt worse then cigs.

Except for those Fox News Channel viewers.

[orangeman]

wow thats pretty sweet. now finally people might realize that pot isnt worse then cigs.

Why would they think that in the first place?

[beachguy in thongs]

Why would they think that in the first place?

Because cigarettes have filters?

[Stellar]

Why would they think that in the first place?

I think less than 5 years ago, there were news reports about Marijuana smoke being more dense with carcinogens than Cigarrete smoke. They were saying something like one joint equaled 5 ciggs.

[Nullific]

Cannabis lacks the radioactive elements. That's a very important detail to me that lots of people overlook.

[1234abcd]

Yeah I read this study a couple weeks ago, Im glad it made it over to msnbc.com :thumbsup:

[Stellar]

Cannabis lacks the radioactive elements. That's a very important detail to me that lots of people overlook.

?

Radioactive particulates are a by-product of most combustion. Radioactive Particulates are in cannabis smoke, just as they are in cigarette smoke, and virtually all burned plant materials.