PROVE MY DUMBASS FRIEND WRONG PLEASE GOD

[Rizzle]

I don't think it can't happen. But from wht I read, and found out the truth n how the govt lied to us n ur friend,plus 2 days daily factoid chances are very very slim. *looks < to > all of a sudden paranoid* F U uncle sam 4 all the bullshit propaganda u poisned us with n if ur watching n try 2 seize me I warn u my house is wired 2 blow. N no I'm not some crazed hippie *tokes a bowl*

You are a absolute moron, its people like you that will never get cannabis legalized "my house is wired to blow" .....Idiot your probably like 15

[Rizzle]

Ok, this calls for us to think about it logically.

Cannabis has no direct link whatsoever with any form of cancerous tissue, although, i hate to say it, any smoke will be bad for your lungs, altohugh maybe cannabis really isnt. What i do know is, no one has ever died from cannabis, no one will ever die from cannabis, which makes me think, maybe it actually doesnt cause cancer, and maybe it does prevent it. I dont know, but im gunner carry on smoking it, and if i get cancer, i'll let you know.

Noone here knows what there talking about 100%(on this subject) , only what they have read or been told. Unless you are a Research Doctor , im pretty sure none of us can say for sure.

However i do agree with You LIP and some of the others but im a stoner so im bias man:thumbsup:

[Rizzle]

[QUOTE=Polymirize]I think you have to be incredibly stupid to think that pulling smoke into your lungs is going to have anything but negative effects on the tissue.


lmao

[Storm Crow]

http://www.hempworld.com/HempPharm/a...nabinoidsantic....

http://www.erowid.org/plants/cannabi...ournal/1975_mu...

http://www.counterpunch.org/gardner070220005.html

Also NORML has some interesting stuff on cancer and pot.

[Fan o KmK]

http://www.hempworld.com/HempPharm/a...nabinoidsantic....

http://www.erowid.org/plants/cannabi...ournal/1975_mu...

http://www.counterpunch.org/gardner070220005.html

Also NORML has some interesting stuff on cancer and pot.

lol none of those links work...

[Nullific]

Have you brought up the polonium argument yet? I'm lazy, so I'm just copying and pasting this from another post of mine.

Originally Posted by graph
Cancer is a very dangerous thing, and there have been arguments back and forth about what is worse. Keep in mind, while tar has shown to be one of many contributing factors in lung cancer, what has shown to be more prevalent in causing any type of cancer is radioactivity. Tobacco industries use polonium-210, which is a radioactive substance, to grow tobacco plants. While the FDA says that polonium-210 was shown to have no negative side affects while ingesting plants grown using the radioactive substance, it is still inconclusive if smoking such plant can cause lung cancer. Also, keep in mind cannabis users don't smoke leaves, but the bud, which contains 33% less tar, and cannabis does not narrow the air passages in the lungs like tobacco.

Your buddy is dead wrong, ppl get cancer for cigarrets because of the fact that the government has growers grow the tobacco in some kind of soil that has small amounts of radioactivity, I wich I could remember the soruce, if any has heard of this post it.

Tobacco crops are fertilized with calcium phosphate fertilizers derived from the mineral apatite which does contain traces of radium, polonium 210 and lead 210. When the tobacco is growing these particles get trapped and concentrated on the leaf. Polonium 210 is the only ingredient in tobacco tar that has been proven to cause cancers in lab animals by itself.

http://www.acsa2000.net/HealthAlert/...e_tobacco.html
http://www.ukcia.org/research/cancer2.htm
http://nepenthes.lycaeum.org/Drugs/T...ancer.rad.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_...obacco_smoking

[King of Shiva]

We should all assume smoking weed *could* give you cancer just due to the sheer fact that you are smoking it.

But, really, would any of us stop smoking weed if we found out it causes cancer? I somehow don't expect to see most smokers stopping.

Wholehearted agreement here....

While a typical cannabis joint may contain as much as 150% of the tar of a cigarette, think of how many joints you smoke in a day compared to even a light tobacco smoker. Tobacco also contains many other chemicals that brew into a nice cocktail of carcinogens.

That being said, there are many other lung diseases other than cancer, and many are helped along by breathing in tar which coats and damages the tiny scillia in the airways. But the same is true (and probably moreso) with smoggy air, and I don't see any health nuts wearing gas masks on the street

To my mind, the benefits far outweight any perceived threats. Okay, said my piece :dance:

-=The King=-

[growitandsmokeit]

Smoking anything isn't good for your lungs and I would be more supprised if there was no chance of getting cancer than if there were.

[artisian]

Here in NY we have no laws to protect victims of Cancer or Aids hiv Glaucoma waging a war against the suffering in this country has to end while Bush has to clean his ass of the mexicans on our borders who bring us dirt weed.imp: