Stoner, even with your system, there will be wealthy, and unwealthy alike...

Take for intance a person who has a trade that everyone needs; his services will be needed more than say someone who shoe's horses. Not everyone will be fortunate enough to do something everyone needs. Therefore, not everyone will be equal...just like it is now!

Money is not evil, but it does place people in classes, which your sytem would do as well.

Btw, not too many people will provide their services w/o something in return. A farmer won't simply give his food away, he'll need something given back to him, and if you can't provide something he needs, then your sh!t out of luck!

I think your system would fail, whereas the system we have now actually WORKS! Why fix what's not broken?

Seriously, what would be the difference between your sytem, and what we have now, man? (Other than certain starvation for those who have no beneficial trade)

You may not agree with our monotary system, but it DOES work!

I'm interested to know 'why' you think your system is better than what we have now, because I don't see it!

How would it work, and what exactly do you suggest I be fighting for?

Being realistic,