I have a theory

[mrdevious]

magic tricks????
you call the other dimensions magic tricks???
ok we all die and just push daisies and thats it
we all came from 1 cell that magically reproduced itself
or there were 2 cells in the beginining that magically appeared and fucked and spawned us. I highly doubt it

I think what he's saying is you can't just propose something instantly creating everything, when the theory has no more evidence than your own imagination.

[harmonicminor]

who says it was instant???
Imagination and thought created all of this :-)
none of anyones theories can ever be proved anyway
unless beings from the other dimensions come to this realty and enlighten us or maybe the almighty himself if he even exists
but our proof will come to us when we die

[Polymirize]

I'll give you another dimension as the source of an "event", and even give it a role with continual access, but can't we also accept the "reality" of history?

The existence of another dimension(s) does not negate the existence of ours.

[harmonicminor]

our written history only goes back so far. the Torah is riddled with stuff that could be interpreted in different ways. our Earth is full of artifacts that don't make sense at all. for instance we cant even recreate the pyramids on a 1/4 scale with all of our technology.
Im not saying go to church every sunday because they just take your money anyways. Back when the Torah was written they used the plants to get to the other dimensions. the Holy Grail was actually an Amanita Muscara mushroom not a damn cup.
now think of this......
If the first life form was a single cell animal then what the hell did it eat to survive??????? I am sorry but I find that crap hard to believe. The majority of the public will believe anything anybody on tv tells them. too many people are brainwashed every day in front of thier tvs.

[Polymirize]

you think evolution is hard to swallow and obvious brainwashing while holding to ideas of other dimensions and mushroom sacraments?

I guess its not like you'll ever be proven wrong. Way to rock the status quo...

[graph]

If the first life form was a single cell animal then what the hell did it eat to survive???????

Sorry I haven't really been in this thread, but I gotta pop in and say something about this.

First of all, since you said animals, we're talking protozoa, which I believe are still loosely in the animal kingdom. Now there are thousands of different single cells, some of them being parasites, which as we all know, feast on other cells. Other, more simple cells, such as single cell flagellates or amoeboid protozoa can eat using lysosomes to actually ingest themselves. (like what happens to a tadpole's flagellan tail when it becomes a frog)

Another rule of thought would be multiple single-celled organisms forming at once (why must there be only one?) Some single cells would produce faster, and would probably be the target of the pseudopods on amoebas, etc.



There's a lot of flaws with Darwin's original theory, but he is only one man and it's only been a short period of time. The bible has had how many years to correct its errors?

The problem is, too many people take what's written in the bible as undeniable proof. Darwin has a theory, but Christianity is a belief. The problem is, you can change theories depending on what seems to be the most fact. It's harder for people to change what they believe.

[harmonicminor]

hmmmm
how did these organisms form??? from where did they get the tissue that made up the cells??? where did they get thier dna?? or the thought process that was a key to life?? and they all formed at once in the beginning??
also I didnt say I believed the bible either because to me the bible was a was to keep the primitive people in line back 2000 years ago. life formed millions of years before the bible and not necessarily on our planet first either.
if gravity is formed by a planets wieght on the fabric of reality is it not possible for life on the other side of this fabric??