Results 1 to 10 of 51
Threaded View
-
04-29-2006, 09:12 PM #27
Senior Member
may day
I didn't change anything... you can look it all up, the collapase and time leading up to and after are all caught on many videos... please watch the ones I've posted..
Originally Posted by Bong30
The problem with your thoughts... the building was made like a screen, it was able to take hole in the exoskeleton.. up to 4 or 5 jumbo jets... it was designed to withstand the impact...
Originally Posted by Bong30
"Frank A. DeMartini, Manager, WTC Construction and Project Management, discusses the fact that the WTC towers were designed to take multiple hits from airliners and not collapse, comparing it to poking a pencil through fly netting, DeMartini was adament that the towers would not collapse. DeMartini died in the towers on 9/11, this interview clip was taken from video shot in January 2001."
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...gnedtotake.htm
and fire doesn't melt steel... specially after and hour of burning... That physics....
"We know that the steel components were certified to ASTM E119. The time temperature curves for this standard require the samples to be exposed to temperatures around 2000F for several hours. And as we all agree, the steel applied met those specifications. Additionally, I think we can all agree that even un-fireproofed steel will not melt until reaching red-hot temperatures of nearly 3000F (2). Why Dr. Brown would imply that 2000F would melt the high-grade steel used in those buildings makes no sense at all."
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...ywithstood.htm
That's just stupid... I don't need to source anything to prove how dumb that is.... you don't think it takes longer than 9 seconds for 90 floors to fall one at a time until the reach the last one?? that's 10 storys a second... go look at a ten story building and honestly think it can fall flat in one second... a three story house can't even do that... much less a 90 story building...
Originally Posted by Bong30
Because you think pyroclastic flow is something it isn't doesn't mean it's right, it means you're wrong... "Photos taken moments before the collapse of WTC 7 show small office fires on just two floors." Two floors on fire to drop a 70 story building... it would have to be the first ever... and even before the other buildings next to it that were damaged much more than WTC7 was... building 7 is a joke... if you think debris that caused two floors to catch fire caused the building to collapse on itself is the reason, then please tell me how a bomb can be placed under the Oklahoma City building, or even the WTC before this attack and not completly fall?? You've seen oklahoma right? half the building is gone, blown up, but the other half... still standing... cause fire doesn't cause them to fall.... that's why they use steel and concreate...
Originally Posted by Bong30
but next time please do try... and let me know when you get that million dollars ok... you're fucking pathetic Bong and I'm glad I have good weed and can tollerate posting this shit for you... I just wish you'd take 5 minutes to look at it rather than come attack me for some other stupid thing...
http://www.reopen911.org/Contest.htm <---- incase you forgot where to get that million... please let me know that they think of your pyroplastic bullshit...










Register To Reply
Staff Online