Results 21 to 30 of 51
-
04-29-2006, 07:21 PM #21
OPSenior Member
may day
you just keep saying the same shit
you dont like the answer i give so you say i dont answer
i do read your emotional babble
-
04-29-2006, 07:21 PM #22
Senior Member
may day
sorry i missed it by .4... but 9.8 still isn't fast enough to drop the building... so go ahead and tell me why gravity is right again??
pyroclastic - isn't a word... that was your whole answer..
who's trigger happy??
just like i said stop posting shit.. I'm not the only one who wants you to stop... the idea isn't to post as many stupid threads as you can just so you can do it fast... it's to read and respond with something educated...
-
04-29-2006, 07:24 PM #23
Senior Member
may day
no you didn't answer...
the ones you tried to answer were wrong and I pointed out why... you cannot defend them, that doesn't mean I don't agree that means you're an idiot... and the ones you did answer, you don't think about... you still defend Bush, yet said he spied... that's not an answer, that's oximoronic...
-
04-29-2006, 07:25 PM #24
OPSenior Member
may day
maybe you are gumby
Originally Posted by Shelbay
when P4b tells me to chill i will till then
i will continue to put my point of view out in the world just like you can.
put me on ignore gumby... the real pussy move
like i care what
GS, gumby, pisshead, black dog, think about me (if you hate me and i missed you sorry)
-
04-29-2006, 07:38 PM #25
Senior Member
may day
LOL....don't count on me telling ANYONE in the politics section to chill unless some racial shit goes on. Now back to your corners and come out for a clean/or not/ fight........NOW LETS GET IT ON!!!!!!!!!!!:dance:
Originally Posted by Bong30
By the way, how are you people calculating the speed of gravity? Fact is, gravity works on a mass at a rate of 32.2ft/sec/sec and from there the only thing to take into consideration of a free falling object is the floatability (for lack of a better word). Kind of like comparing dropping a bowling ball as opposed to a feather or piece of paper. Or in the case of a falling building it may have resistance on the fall do to the building itself.
Have a good one!:thumbsup:
-
04-29-2006, 07:38 PM #26
Senior Member
may day
we aren't attacking you what don't you get about that?? I understand you may be a douche bag, but I don't give a shit if you want to be one or not...
what we are trying to tell you that you cannot seem to get through your fucking skull is that you talk like a 8 year old.... you bring nothing to the discussions and the points you make are hypocratical, oximoronic or just plain stupid... it's that fact that we have to try to read through you shit to realize they are pointless that we are pissed about... it's the fact that you cannot form a personal thought and that you google for defitions of words to post after everything we write... it's the fact that you put shit in every thread...
how many people do you need to tell you your posts are worthless before you listen to them... yes there is one person who was talking to you, but it is nothing that cannot be posted in 3 posts, not 23... that's all we're trying to say.. you're lack of education and abilty to express it in every post is what pisses us off... not that you're an idiot but the fact that you ignore it
-
04-29-2006, 07:44 PM #27
OPSenior Member
may day
nope just you attacking me
-
04-29-2006, 07:49 PM #28
Senior Member
may day
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
earth's gravity is 9.8 m/s... it's how you can figure out how much something wieghs on earth... the pull of any object on earth is 9.8 m/s (there are changes in altitude and what not, but the standard is 9.8) so when you drop anything, no matter what it travels at 9.8 m/s... feathers and bowling balls only fall at different rates because of the resistance caused by air, or floatability.
"The natural force of attraction between any two massive bodies, which is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them"
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...61603&q=9%2F11
they explian it better than i could... minute 113 - the fall of WTC 7 and the gravity needed... but watch the whole thing... as scientific as you need... I'm not here to prove I'm right... I'm here to explain what I believe and what lead me to believe it... if you can watch this and not believe what I do please explian to me why... that's all I'm asking...
-
04-29-2006, 07:51 PM #29
OPSenior Member
may day
you are right p4b
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
but i was talking about, and gumby was tring to talk about
acceleration due to gravity (g)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The acceleration that an object experiences because of gravity when it falls freely close to the surface of a massive body, such as a planet. Also known as the acceleration of free fall, its value can be calculated from the formula
g = GM / (R + h)2
where M is the mass of the gravitating body (such as the Earth), R is the radius of the body, h is the height above the surface, and G is the gravitational constant (= 6.6742 � 10-11 N·m2/kg2). If the falling object is at, or very nearly at, the surface of the gravitating body, then the above equation reduces to
g = GM / R2
In the case of the Earth, g comes out to be approximately 9.8 m/s2, though the exact value depends on location because of two main factors: the Earth's rotation and the Earth's equatorial bulge. The downward force of gravity is opposed by an outward centrifugal force due to the planet's rotation, which is greater at the equator than at a higher latitudes. (The centrifugal force is "fictitious" in the sense that the real force caused by rotation is the centripetal force; however, it is a convenient fiction for the sake of calculations.) By itself, this effect would result in a range of values of g from 9.789 m/s2 at the equator to 9.823 m/s2 at the poles. This discrepancy is further accentuated because of the Earth's equatorial bulge, which causes objects at lower latitudes to be further from the planet's center than objects nearer the poles and hence subject to a slightly weaker gravitational pull. Overall these two effects result in a variation of 0.052 m/s2 in the value of g, which leads to a variation in the weight of an object by about 0.5% depending on whether it is weighed at the equator or at one of the poles. Taking an average over the whole surface of the Earth, physicists have arrived at a standard value for g of 9.80665 m/s2. On other planets and moons the values of the acceleration due to gravity may be very different, resulting in different weights for the same object on these various worlds.
-
04-29-2006, 07:52 PM #30
OPSenior Member
may day
i was talking acceleration due to gravity








Register To Reply
Staff Online