but do you really think they will stop after we attack them?? And do you think we'd have support doing that?? Much less resistance in doing that?? Don't forget that Russia and China wouldn't be too happy with us if we bombed Iran... I'm sure most other countries wouldn't be as well... we only have the greatest power because we have support not resistance. If other countries figure out that we are killing people and failing to complete what we set out to do they will become unwilling to support us in the decisions we make and that is not good... We do still have UN and we are not incharge of the world... after the neuclear power was obtained JFK made it a fact that no one country would ever be able to win a global war without killing everyone, which is why there are agreements with other countries. Which is why we do not want Iran to break those agreements... but we should go through due process before we go bomb someone else... it's set up that way so we don't have another world war, because the next one will be worse than the last...

they have done nothing wrong and we should not charge them or plan on bombing them until they do... they are free to create nueclear power... it's a free wolrd right?? Why should we not allow them to have power, yet allow North Korea?? Why not bomb them first?? They are much more of a threat than Iran... Iran is still 3-10 years from coming up with a bomb... yet we still allow a dictator to control bombs in North Korea

"North Korea has come under pressure to curb its nuclear ambitions. U.S. intelligence sources say the nation has enough weapons grade plutonium for two to five nuclear devices."

http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/asiapc...9/korea.china/

that was two years ago and we haven't bombed them yet... I say either bomb the shit out of them as well... or use the same path for Iran and try not to get more people killed.