Activity Stream
227,828 MEMBERS
14791 ONLINE
greengrassforums On YouTube Subscribe to our Newsletter greengrassforums On Twitter greengrassforums On Facebook greengrassforums On Google+
banner1

Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1.     
    #1
    Senior Member

    FDA ruling?

    ok i'm not the best in govermental issues, but i heard that the FDA has weed doesn't hold (any or enough can't remember) medical properties.. so does that mean we're back to square 1? or does it just not make a fuck what the FDA says?
    slipknotpsycho Reviewed by slipknotpsycho on . FDA ruling? ok i'm not the best in govermental issues, but i heard that the FDA has weed doesn't hold (any or enough can't remember) medical properties.. so does that mean we're back to square 1? or does it just not make a fuck what the FDA says? Rating: 5

  2.   Advertisements

  3.     
    #2
    Senior Member

    FDA ruling?

    Quote Originally Posted by slipknotpsycho
    ok i'm not the best in govermental issues, but i heard that the FDA has weed doesn't hold (any or enough can't remember) medical properties.. so does that mean we're back to square 1? or does it just not make a fuck what the FDA says?
    The fda had to say what they said. we are not back to square one...they are.
    The truth always advances.

    dai*ma:stoned:

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-24-2013, 02:15 AM
  2. Wa. State v. Jason Fry: supreme ct. ruling
    By jamessr in forum Legal
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-24-2010, 09:53 PM
  3. Oregon - Ruling protects pot patients
    By duffydawn in forum Medical Marijuana News
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-01-2007, 01:04 AM
  4. War on terror ruling worries GOP lawmakers
    By Great Spirit in forum Politics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-02-2006, 08:51 PM
  5. The ruling of Judge Francis Young
    By Torog in forum GreenGrassForums Lounge
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 02-28-2006, 04:50 PM
Amount:

Enter a message for the receiver:
BE SOCIAL
GreenGrassForums On Facebook