Activity Stream
227,828 MEMBERS
11349 ONLINE
greengrassforums On YouTube Subscribe to our Newsletter greengrassforums On Twitter greengrassforums On Facebook greengrassforums On Google+
banner1

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1.     
    #1
    Senior Member

    FDA Rules Out Medical Marijuana... your thoughts.

    http://washtimes.com/upi/20060420-103304-7138r.htm

    *FDA Rules Out Medical Marijuana

    Man, that fucking sucks. I mean, we already know that they've never been for it, but they haven't even given it any thought. I like especially when they say, "high potential for abuse." Are you fucking kidding me? :what:

    Just wanted everyone's thoughts and opinions on this shit.. And the absurdness they have of giving this statement on 4/20!
    zephyrinne Reviewed by zephyrinne on . FDA Rules Out Medical Marijuana... your thoughts. http://washtimes.com/upi/20060420-103304-7138r.htm *FDA Rules Out Medical Marijuana Man, that fucking sucks. I mean, we already know that they've never been for it, but they haven't even given it any thought. I like especially when they say, "high potential for abuse." Are you fucking kidding me? :what: Just wanted everyone's thoughts and opinions on this shit.. And the absurdness they have of giving this statement on 4/20! Rating: 5

  2.   Advertisements

  3.     
    #2
    Senior Member

    FDA Rules Out Medical Marijuana... your thoughts.

    They suck ass. That's what I think. Can't really trust the FDA anyway. One day something is the best thing for you ever.....next day it gives you cancer.
    [align=center]I was gone for a while and now I\'m back. :jointsmile: [/align]

  4.     
    #3
    Senior Member

    FDA Rules Out Medical Marijuana... your thoughts.

    and they raided a medical club in sacremento on the same day.

  5.     
    #4
    Senior Member

    FDA Rules Out Medical Marijuana... your thoughts.

    It was on the cover of New York Times today...
    at least in the article it recognizes professors/researchers saying what the FDA is saying is bullshit...

  6.     
    #5
    Senior Member

    FDA Rules Out Medical Marijuana... your thoughts.

    Just goes to show that the FDA is all about politics and the drug corporations' money.

  7.     
    #6
    Senior Member

    FDA Rules Out Medical Marijuana... your thoughts.

    Quote Originally Posted by xblackdogx
    It was on the cover of New York Times today...
    at least in the article it recognizes professors/researchers saying what the FDA is saying is bullshit...
    I didn't see the link for NYT... I'll have to go check it out. I'd like to see what those professors and scientists had to say.

  8.     
    #7
    Senior Member

    FDA Rules Out Medical Marijuana... your thoughts.

    They'll just have to legalize it for recreational purposes. :smokin:

  9.     
    #8
    Senior Member

    FDA Rules Out Medical Marijuana... your thoughts.

    its better they dont legalize it
    now i can charge whatever i want
    since i got the best herb in east los
    Love is patient and kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. Love is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, and it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. Love always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres

  10.     
    #9
    Senior Member

    FDA Rules Out Medical Marijuana... your thoughts.

    drug companies dont want anything stepping in on their pain medicine or whatever.

    im watchin cnn headline news. whenever they have something to say about medical marijuana they show this clip of this 70+ year old grandma toking a huge spliff lol

  11.     
    #10
    Senior Member

    FDA Rules Out Medical Marijuana... your thoughts.

    FDA Rejects Marijuana For Medical Uses
    April 21, 2006 12:41 PM

    The Food and Drug Administration said Thursday that it does not support the use of marijuana for medical purposes.

    The FDA said in a statement that it and other agencies with the Health and Human Services Department had "concluded that no sound scientific studies supported medical use of marijuana for treatment in the United States, and no animal or human data supported the safety or efficacy of marijuana for general medical use."

    A number of states have passed legislation allowing marijuana use for medical purposes, but the FDA said, "These measures are inconsistent with efforts to ensure that medications undergo the rigorous scientific scrutiny of the FDA approval process and are proven safe and effective."

    The statement contradicts a 1999 finding from the Institute of Medicine, part of the National Academy of Sciences, which reported that "marijuana's active components are potentially effective in treating pain, nausea, the anorexia of AIDS wasting and other symptoms, and should be tested rigorously in clinical trials."

    Bruce Mirken, director of communications for the Marijuana Policy Project, said Thursday: "If anybody needed proof that the FDA has become totally politicized, this is it. This isn't a scientific statement; it's a political statement."

    Mirken said "a rabid congressional opponent of medical marijuana," Rep. Mark Souder, R-Ind., asked the FDA to make the statement.

    Souder, chairman of the House Government Reform subcommittee on drug policy, has said the promotion of medical marijuana "is simply a red herring for the legalization of marijuana for recreational use. Studies have continually rejected the notion that marijuana is suitable for medical use because it adversely impacts concentration and memory, the lungs, motor coordination and the immune system."

    The FDA statement noted "there is currently sound evidence that smoked marijuana is harmful." It also said, "There are alternative FDA-approved medications in existence for treatment of many of the proposed uses of smoked marijuana."

    Mirken responded, "There is abundant evidence that marijuana can help cancer patients, multiple sclerosis patients and AIDS patients. There is no scientific doubt that marijuana relieves nausea, vomiting, certain kinds of pain and other symptoms that don't respond well to conventional drugs, and does it more safely than other drugs.

    "For the FDA to ignore all that evidence is embarrassing," Mirken said. "They should be red-faced."

    http://www.wtkr.com/Global/story.asp?S=4800791

    I think you need to subscribe to the New York Times article.

Similar Threads

  1. Medical Marijuana Rules in California
    By WesMan6868 in forum Northern California
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 03-25-2011, 06:56 PM
  2. Rules to Purge L.A.â??s Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Take Effect
    By WIlDuce1883 in forum Southern California
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-08-2010, 12:01 AM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-27-2009, 06:30 AM
  4. CN - New rules 'slap in the face': Medical marijuana advocates
    By Galaxy in forum Medical Marijuana News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-27-2009, 02:14 AM
  5. CA: Oakdale rules out medical marijuana dispensaries
    By Psycho4Bud in forum Medical Marijuana News
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-30-2008, 12:06 PM
Amount:

Enter a message for the receiver:
BE SOCIAL
GreenGrassForums On Facebook