Quote Originally Posted by Oneironaut
Charlie Sheen? Haha, as if he's a credible investigator here. I think I'll trust the scientists and firefighters on this one, but if we must play the celebrity game, we've got Penn & Teller on our side. http://www.sho.com/site/ptbs/prevepi...pisodeid=s3/ct

I used to buy this stuff back when I was only reading one side of the debate. But as I actually started investigating what skeptics had to say, I realized it's just about as grounded in objective evidence as the moon hoax conspiracy theory. I hate the government as much as the next guy, but I'm not going to make up lies about it. I have enough real reasons to hate it.
WoW do you fell the same way about the firemen that were in the twintowers that said they heard bombs going off

We were trying to get some of the people out, but then there was secondary explosions and then subsequent collapses."

"As we were getting our gear on and making our way to the stairway, there was a heavy duty explosion."

"Shortly after 9 o'clock ... [Albert Turi the Chief of Safety for the New York Fire Department] received word of the possibility of a secondary device, that is another bomb going off. He tried to get his men out as quickly as he could, but he said there was another explosion which took place, and then an hour after the first hit - the first crash that took place - he said there was another explosion that took place in one of the towers here, so obviously according to his theory he thinks that there were actually devices that were planted in the building.


Two WTC impacts. Three explosions reported.


One of the secondary devices he thinks that took place after the initial impact he thinks may have been on the plane that crashed into one of the towers. The second device - he thinks, he speculates - was probably planted in the building. ... But the bottom line is that he, Albert Turi, said that he probably lost a great many men in those secondary explosions, and he said that there were literally hundreds, if not thousands, of people in those towers when the explosions took place."
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/911_firefighters.html
eg420ne Reviewed by eg420ne on . Sheen Challenges Official 9/11 Fable on National TV, w/video http://prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/150406sheentv.htm either the perfect collapse of building 7 was random, even though steel buildings have burned for days and not fallen...or the charges were set in the building in a matter of hours because they thought it was going to fall...or they were placed in advance, which is absolutely necessary for a perfect collapse like we saw with building 7... not important enough to be included in the 9/11 commission report...building 7 wasn't hit Rating: 5