Sheen Challenges Official 9/11 Fable on National TV, w/video

[pisshead]

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/apr...406sheentv.htm

either the perfect collapse of building 7 was random, even though steel buildings have burned for days and not fallen...or the charges were set in the building in a matter of hours because they thought it was going to fall...or they were placed in advance, which is absolutely necessary for a perfect collapse like we saw with building 7...

not important enough to be included in the 9/11 commission report...building 7 wasn't hit by a plane and was further away than buildings closer that were actually hit by big chunks of the towers...

can the big government apologists who aren't conservative prove a building can be wired for detonation in several hours (assuming the thinking on 9/11 wasn't...oh my god, we've been attacked, we better start loading building 7 with explosives so we can 'pull' it)...or can they show 1 other example of a modern, reinforced steel building collapsing because of a few small fires in different parts of the building...in a perfecly symmetrical fashion...

just 1...that's it.

that rests with the 9/11 freedom hating muslim hijacker conspiracy theorists...

[align=left]A Defiant Sheen Challenges Official 9/11 Fable on National TV[/align]
Dares Millions of Viewers to "Do [their] own research"
Prison Planet | April 15 2006

Actor Charlie Sheen made history when he first questioned the official story of 9/11, calling it the "biggest conspiracy theory of them all."

Sheen's comments sent shockwaves across the alternative media and have been one of the biggest stories on the internet for weeks. The story also garnered prime time coverage by major news outlets including CNN, FOX News, and hundreds of newspapers worldwide.

Following his brave step into the spotlight over his 9/11 questions and the ensuing backlash of attacks and hit pieces, Sheen issued an email statement to the media demanding that he be challenged on the facts instead of junior high name-calling. Not one single mainstream media outlet has had the nerve to take Sheen up on his challenge.

Only a few days after Sheen's story broke in the mainstream press, sources within FOX News and CNN told Alex Jones off-the-record that there was a concerted effort from their companies' management to "kill" the Sheen story and to end any favorable coverage of the 9/11 Truth Movement. Producers were given this dictate despite the record high ratings and positive audience feedback that was received from coverage of the Sheen 9/11 story.

On Friday, April 14th on ABC's Jimmy Kimmel Live talk show, Sheen once again brought forward his questions about the official story to tens of millions of Americans. When asked by host Jimmy Kimmel about the statements he made on The Alex Jones radio show, Sheen succinctly remarked, "I just had questions, I had a lot of questions."

He went further, decrying the media's treatment of his statements, noting that "[the mainstream media] didn't really take a look at any of the stuff I was asking them to look at, any of the evidence or any of the stuff that generated those questions..." instead they spun it into the story of whether or not he was "qualified" to question the government.

"I felt the only real validation that I needed was being a tax paying citizen that loves my country," Sheen expressed to a powerful round of applause from the studio audience. Sheen continued, "What happed to the time in this country when we were entitled, when we had a constitutional and a God-given right to be curious about things that didn't make sense."

When asked by Kimmel what had brought him to pose his questions about the official story, Sheen replied, "I've done a lot of research," then referred to the growing number of high-profile individuals who have already bravely stepped forward to ask questions about 9/11, stating "...its not just me, its the people that have come before me - the experts and the engineers, the physicists and the scientists and the scholars, that raised a lot of these things and I took a look at their research and said yeah, it doesn't add up, a lot of it doesn't add up, hence these questions."
Before Kimmel moved the discussion to another topic, Sheen was careful to remind the audience, "There are two areas: Building 7 and the five frames from the Pentagon. Don't listen to me, do your own research."

Following the broadcast of the Jimmy Kimmel Live show, Alex Jones spoke with Sheen about his views concerning the interview. Sheen made the following statement:

"This is a landmark moment in the 9/11 Truth Movement. We have fired a flaming arrow into the heart of the myopic propaganda posing as the irrefutable official story. Come one, come all, the floodgates have opened! Reveal your patriotism."

In response Alex Jones stated, "In my 12 years of broadcast, I have broken hundreds of stories that have gained national attention, but none have captured the imagination of the people like Charlie Sheen's statements on 9/11. Universally people recognize that his courageous stand has smashed the floodgates and the tide has now turned. The 9/11 Truth Movement saw its birth over four and a half years ago and it witnessed an unprecedented infusion when Charlie Sheen spoke out. "
"The bottom line is that people resonate with Charlie Sheen's courage. The average man or woman understands that Sheen is taking a risk by saying aloud what they have only thought about in secret: 9/11 was an inside job and the foundational event for the police state growing in America and the pretext for the ongoing wars for global empire.â?�

pisshead Reviewed by pisshead on 04-15-2006. Sheen Challenges Official 9/11 Fable on National TV, w/video http://prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/150406sheentv.htm either the perfect collapse of building 7 was random, even though steel buildings have burned for days and not fallen...or the charges were set in the building in a matter of hours because they thought it was going to fall...or they were placed in advance, which is absolutely necessary for a perfect collapse like we saw with building 7... not important enough to be included in the 9/11 commission report...building 7 wasn't hit Rating: 5

[Bong30]

You are funny with that shit...... alex jones...hahahahahah He should have a disclaimer (for entertainment only)

Charlie sheen...........hahahahahahahhaahah i wouldnt trust him if he told me the time

[eg420ne]

So bong30 what you think happen to building 7--since you didnt debunk it

[Bong30]

i think it fell due to fire and

a version of this,

Pyroclastic flows are fluidized masses of rock fragments and gases that move rapidly in response to gravity. Pyroclastic flows can form in several different ways. They can form when an eruption column collapses, or as the result of gravitational collapse or explosion on a lava dome or lava flow (Francis, 1993 and Scott, 1989). These flows are more dense than pyroclastic surges and can contain as much as 80 % unconsolidated material. The flow is fluidized because it contains water and gas from the eruption, water vapor from melted snow and ice, and air from the flow overriding air as it moves downslope (Scott, 1989). The image on the right shows the formation of pyroclastic flows during a 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens (photo courtesy of J.M. Vallance).

Ignimbrites and nuees ardentes are two types of pyroclastic flows. An ignimbite contains mostly vesiculated material whereas a nuee ardente contains denser material (Francis, 1993). Nuee ardente means glowing cloud and was named for the pyroclastic flows seen at Mount Pelee. These flows were often accompanied by a cloud of ash elutriated from the flow. When the incadescent ash particles are observed at night, the flow looks like a glowing cloud moving away from the volcano.

Pyroclastic flows can move very fast. Small pyroclastic flows can move as fast as 10 to 30 m/s while larger flows can move at rates of 200 m/s (Bryant, 1991). Nuees ardentes have been known to extend 50 kilometers from their source and Ignimbrites, because of the lighter weight material that they carry, can extend 200 km from their source (Bryant, 1991 and Scott, 1989). At Mount Pinatubo in the Philipines, pyroclastic flow deposits were 220 m thick in some valleys but averaged 30 to 50 m thick in others (Wolfe, 1992). Pyroclastic flows have been known to top ridges 1000 m high (Bryant, 1991). The image on the left shows a pyroclastic flow descending Fuego Volcano in Guatemala (photo by W.C. Buell IV, 1974).
Click here for a movie of a pyroclastic flow at Mount Pinatubo (movie courtesy of M.T. Dolan).


Pyroclastic flows can be very hot. In fact, pyroclastic flows from Mount Pelee had temperatures as high as 1075 degrees C (Bryant, 1991)! Some Pyroclastic flows from Pinatubo had temperatures of 750 degrees C and pyroclastic flows from Mount St. Helens had temperatures of 350 degrees C ( Bryant, 1991). Such high temperature flows can burn manmade structures, vegetation, and, for those unlikely enough to be caught by then, human skin


put a little jet fuel and some other flamables there is this thing called friction heat........you guys are dumb

just admit that you guys hate bush so much you will twist physics to fit your views

[pisshead]

that explains nothing about building 7. nothing specific about building 7. certainly not why it would collapse perfectly. building 7 wasn't hit by a plane.

congratulations, you're a moron. george bush is as much a puppet as bill clinton.

[activedenial]

You laugh at Alex Jones, and I laugh at entertainment news run by five corporations. They have got you to be one of the sheep. While I listen to alex jones and the real news, you go watch nataly holloway murder case on tv, or the raped black girl by duke university students. HA HA HAAAAA!:thumbsup:

[eg420ne]

i think it fell due to fire and

a version of this,

Pyroclastic flows are fluidized masses of rock fragments and gases that move rapidly in response to gravity. Pyroclastic flows can form in several different ways. They can form when an eruption column collapses, or as the result of gravitational collapse or explosion on a lava dome or lava flow (Francis, 1993 and Scott, 1989). These flows are more dense than pyroclastic surges and can contain as much as 80 % unconsolidated material. The flow is fluidized because it contains water and gas from the eruption, water vapor from melted snow and ice, and air from the flow overriding air as it moves downslope (Scott, 1989). The image on the right shows the formation of pyroclastic flows during a 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens (photo courtesy of J.M. Vallance).

Ignimbrites and nuees ardentes are two types of pyroclastic flows. An ignimbite contains mostly vesiculated material whereas a nuee ardente contains denser material (Francis, 1993). Nuee ardente means glowing cloud and was named for the pyroclastic flows seen at Mount Pelee. These flows were often accompanied by a cloud of ash elutriated from the flow. When the incadescent ash particles are observed at night, the flow looks like a glowing cloud moving away from the volcano.

Pyroclastic flows can move very fast. Small pyroclastic flows can move as fast as 10 to 30 m/s while larger flows can move at rates of 200 m/s (Bryant, 1991). Nuees ardentes have been known to extend 50 kilometers from their source and Ignimbrites, because of the lighter weight material that they carry, can extend 200 km from their source (Bryant, 1991 and Scott, 1989). At Mount Pinatubo in the Philipines, pyroclastic flow deposits were 220 m thick in some valleys but averaged 30 to 50 m thick in others (Wolfe, 1992). Pyroclastic flows have been known to top ridges 1000 m high (Bryant, 1991). The image on the left shows a pyroclastic flow descending Fuego Volcano in Guatemala (photo by W.C. Buell IV, 1974).
Click here for a movie of a pyroclastic flow at Mount Pinatubo (movie courtesy of M.T. Dolan).


Pyroclastic flows can be very hot. In fact, pyroclastic flows from Mount Pelee had temperatures as high as 1075 degrees C (Bryant, 1991)! Some Pyroclastic flows from Pinatubo had temperatures of 750 degrees C and pyroclastic flows from Mount St. Helens had temperatures of 350 degrees C ( Bryant, 1991). Such high temperature flows can burn manmade structures, vegetation, and, for those unlikely enough to be caught by then, human skin


put a little jet fuel and some other flamables there is this thing called friction heat........you guys are dumb

just admit that you guys hate bush so much you will twist physics to fit your views

Yes i do hate GWbush for the damaged he has done to America,, so a fire made building 7 collaspe in a complete CD like way..hmmm you have to try harder then that....remember the burden of proof is on you the ones who beLIEve the government official conspriacy theory...

[pisshead]

and why is it those who disagree with the freedom hating hijacking theory are held to such an impossible standard...when little evidence for the feds' theory can be given...

there were those passports though, that went through clothing and an exploding plane and a burning building, all the way to the ground with such minor damage...we were told it existed before we were told it never existed. but it was good PR at the time i guess...

[Psycho4Bud]

"Sheen's comments sent shockwaves across the alternative media and have been one of the biggest stories on the internet for weeks. The story also garnered prime time coverage by major news outlets including CNN, FOX News, and hundreds of newspapers worldwide."

If being called a nut is sending a shockwave, well I guess he sent one.:thumbsup:

[eg420ne]

Everybody nuts--- since my fuking high got wasted by bong30 useless post i have to roll up another one---C-yaa