Complete Proof (NEW, never seen): Pentagon

[xblackdogx]

It's like your looking for an airplane to be parked in someones office. The rocket is hitting a concrete barrier equivilant to that used for nuclear power facilities. That is even stronger than what the Pentagon had going. The Pentagon plane basically dissolved as it was passing through the rings.

Even if it isnt AS strong as the concrete in your link, it is still concrete and should cause an explosion of debris! ( if you have anything to prove otherwise, please tell)
Dissolved through the rings? PIC below

Look at the pic in the highest resolution: There is no damage in the section right behind the crash but then the next ring back there is... how would you explain that if it went through, and dissolved throught the rings

[Psycho4Bud]

funny that proves that a hijacked plane dident fly into wtc..... the building is still standing WOW look at that....and another thing look at those pics they dont look simular to the flight 93 crash........and so they say they called on cellphones CELL PHONES DID NOT WORK ON PLANES IN 2001, MORE SO JUST BECAME RECENT TECHNOLOGY OF 2004 thank you

LOL...cell phone usage was banned in "01", hate to inform ya and considering that they were WAY BELOW the so called 30,000 ft that people talk about I believe they were able to reach out and touch someone.

You must not watch the tube at all....a plane didn't hit the WTC?

[eg420ne]

The Whitehouse was suppose to be someone elses gig. As for the first part, who knows what was going through their minds....kind of glad I don't!:stoned:

Do you have a picture of them engines--- left side wouldnt had hit the whole building

[CocaCola]

The fact that civilians are gathering more evidence to show the public then the government is makes me question the validity of what they have told us all. And plus with the constant dishonesty from the American government, it makes them hard to believe regardless of the evidence.

[Psycho4Bud]

Even if it isnt AS strong as the concrete in your link, it is still concrete and should cause an explosion of debris! ( if you have anything to prove otherwise, please tell)
Dissolved through the rings? PIC below

Look at the pic in the highest resolution: There is no damage in the section right behind the crash but then the next ring back there is... how would you explain that if it went through, and dissolved throught the rings

Cross reference your pic with this:
http://boards.cannabis.com/attachmen...9&d=1144894491

kind of deceptave with the angle of the camera on that shot.

[Psycho4Bud]

Do you have a picture of them engines--- left side wouldnt had hit the whole building

:thumbsup:

[eg420ne]

Cross reference your pic with this:
http://boards.cannabis.com/attachmen...9&d=1144894491

kind of deceptave with the angle of the camera on that shot.

Dude they show the wings and engines going inside the building when that happen?

[xblackdogx]

No matter what angle it is in, how can you explain in words, not suckering to a picture [which you dont even know if that is the angle that it hit] how there is NO DAMAGE in ring D, but mysteriously in between Ring C and B.... the only part i want you to conted with is the part directly behind initial impact

[Psycho4Bud]

No matter what angle it is in, how can you explain in words, not suckering to a picture [which you dont even know if that is the angle that it hit] how there is NO DAMAGE in ring D, but mysteriously in between Ring C and B.... the only part i want you to conted with is the part directly behind initial impact

So you didn't do a cross comparison of the pics? The angle of the picture hides the damage to your ring of question...compare them dude...it's there.:thumbsup:

[eg420ne]

Its hard to tell from them pixs of the engines to see what size thay are but i see the person standing behind it and it dont match a 757 engine, too small