Results 1 to 10 of 98
			
		- 
	04-12-2006, 10:35 PM #1 OPSenior Member OPSenior Member
 Complete Proof (NEW, never seen): Pentagonstarting fresh b/c i don't want any useless shit that will sway people in the other threads: 
 
 Picture 1: look at the pieces on the ground
 
 Picture 2: i think we can all agree the wingspan of a 757 is longer than this truck
 (where is the damage of the wings?)
 
 COMPLETELY NEW
 3 & 4 go together: previous pictures of the "crash" that including myself have shown are indeed of a different part of the pentagon... after careful looking i realized this yesterday and have finally found an answer...
 
 Picture 3: you can tell this isnt the front the building b/c of the different bricks on the entire ground floor portion. this IS the back of the building.
 
 FEMA's Caption
 "Arlington, VA, September 14, 2001 -- FEMA Urban Search & Rescue team members from Maryland Task Force-1 prepare to enter the Pentagon crash site. Photo by Jocelyn Augustino/ FEMA News Photo"
 
 Picture 4: this proves that this is not where the "crash" took place b/c of the location. the backside of the part that did get hit is almost completely gone. Furthermore, you can see the pink writing on BOTH of the pictures.
 
 So why would FEMA's photos explicitly say this is the back entrance to the Pentagon crash? What was in that portion of the building? I think we can ALL agree that no matter what hit the pentagon, it is not possible for it to reach that part!xblackdogx Reviewed by xblackdogx on . Complete Proof (NEW, never seen): Pentagon starting fresh b/c i don't want any useless shit that will sway people in the other threads: Picture 1: look at the pieces on the ground Picture 2: i think we can all agree the wingspan of a 757 is longer than this truck (where is the damage of the wings?) COMPLETELY NEW 3 & 4 go together: previous pictures of the "crash" that including myself have shown are indeed of a different part of the pentagon... after careful looking i realized this yesterday and have finally found an Rating: 5
 
- 
	04-12-2006, 10:54 PM #2 Senior Member Senior Member
 Complete Proof (NEW, never seen): PentagonIn the first picture are you talking about those things that look like spools? What are you trying to point out? 
 
 Ill agree with you on the second picture, that hole is about the size of one wing of a jumbo jet.
 
 Show me where it says FEMA said this and ill examine it a little closer
 
 How do you know that is the same writing from that areial photo??? How do you know that writing in the first one isnt a photoshop effect?
 
- 
	04-12-2006, 10:59 PM #3 OPSenior Member OPSenior Member
 Complete Proof (NEW, never seen): Pentagon1. 1st picture: little debris for an entire plane 
 
 http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/pho...ils.do?id=4515
 
 the 4th picture i came across, and noticed the similarities... no photoshop
 
- 
	04-12-2006, 11:03 PM #4 Senior Member Senior Member
 Complete Proof (NEW, never seen): Pentagoni laughed out loud, give it up. These pictures have been going around for awhile now. 
 
- 
	04-12-2006, 11:04 PM #5 Senior Member Senior Member
 Complete Proof (NEW, never seen): PentagonWhere did they say picture 3 was the front?? 
 
- 
	04-12-2006, 11:05 PM #6 OPSenior Member OPSenior Member
 Complete Proof (NEW, never seen): Pentagonthey didn't; i said i have previously posted this and said it was the front (until i realized it didnt match the exterior of the front of the pentagon) Originally Posted by Ap0c4lyPtIcF4t3 Originally Posted by Ap0c4lyPtIcF4t3
 
- 
	04-12-2006, 11:18 PM #7 Senior Member Senior Member
 Complete Proof (NEW, never seen): Pentagono why would FEMA's photos explicitly say this is the back entrance to the Pentagon crash? What was in that portion of the building? I think we can ALL agree that no matter what hit the pentagon, it is not possible for it to reach that part!
 where do they say it was the back?
 
- 
	04-12-2006, 11:30 PM #8 OPSenior Member OPSenior Member
 Complete Proof (NEW, never seen): Pentagonit's obviously not the front lol.. let me find the other picture i believe there were 2... Originally Posted by Ap0c4lyPtIcF4t3 Originally Posted by Ap0c4lyPtIcF4t3
 
 seems that there were 3
 http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/pho...ils.do?id=4958
 http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov/pho...ils.do?id=4957
 
- 
	04-13-2006, 12:21 AM #9 Senior Member Senior Member
 Complete Proof (NEW, never seen): Pentagonheres what happened: the pentagon saw the planes going towards the trade center, so they launched a missle after the plane, but the missle turned around and hit the pentagon. they were so imbarrased from the mistake that they blamed it on another airplane. 
 
- 
	04-13-2006, 12:26 AM #10 Senior Member Senior Member
 Complete Proof (NEW, never seen): PentagonAre you not getting what im saying you said.... Originally Posted by xblackdogx Originally Posted by xblackdogx
 
 with which you reply its obviously not the front....WHERE DOES FEMA SAY ITS THE BACK!FEMA's photos explicitly say this is the back entrance to the Pentagon crash?
 
Advertisements
Similar Threads
- 
  Some help for a complete noob please? (Stupid questions, sorry I'm a complete noob)By Leebstatus in forum Basic GrowingReplies: 6Last Post: 02-20-2007, 02:43 PM
- 
  9/11 Pentagon TruthBy Fabolous in forum PoliticsReplies: 28Last Post: 04-23-2006, 04:28 AM
- 
  what hit the pentagon on 9/11By scobbie in forum PoliticsReplies: 72Last Post: 12-24-2005, 09:28 PM
- 
  what hit the pentagon on 9/11By in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 0Last Post: 01-01-1970, 12:00 AM
- 
  9/11 Pentagon TruthBy in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 0Last Post: 01-01-1970, 12:00 AM









 
 
 
 
					
					
					
 Register To Reply
Register To Reply
 Staff Online
  Staff Online