starting fresh b/c i don't want any useless shit that will sway people in the other threads:

Picture 1: look at the pieces on the ground

Picture 2: i think we can all agree the wingspan of a 757 is longer than this truck
(where is the damage of the wings?)

COMPLETELY NEW
3 & 4 go together: previous pictures of the "crash" that including myself have shown are indeed of a different part of the pentagon... after careful looking i realized this yesterday and have finally found an answer...

Picture 3: you can tell this isnt the front the building b/c of the different bricks on the entire ground floor portion. this IS the back of the building.

FEMA's Caption
"Arlington, VA, September 14, 2001 -- FEMA Urban Search & Rescue team members from Maryland Task Force-1 prepare to enter the Pentagon crash site. Photo by Jocelyn Augustino/ FEMA News Photo"

Picture 4: this proves that this is not where the "crash" took place b/c of the location. the backside of the part that did get hit is almost completely gone. Furthermore, you can see the pink writing on BOTH of the pictures.

So why would FEMA's photos explicitly say this is the back entrance to the Pentagon crash? What was in that portion of the building? I think we can ALL agree that no matter what hit the pentagon, it is not possible for it to reach that part!
xblackdogx Reviewed by xblackdogx on . Complete Proof (NEW, never seen): Pentagon starting fresh b/c i don't want any useless shit that will sway people in the other threads: Picture 1: look at the pieces on the ground Picture 2: i think we can all agree the wingspan of a 757 is longer than this truck (where is the damage of the wings?) COMPLETELY NEW 3 & 4 go together: previous pictures of the "crash" that including myself have shown are indeed of a different part of the pentagon... after careful looking i realized this yesterday and have finally found an Rating: 5