Results 21 to 28 of 28
-
09-06-2004, 04:06 AM #21OPSenior Member
Tralfaldamorian ideology
Matter cannot be created or destroyed through chemical reaction, but can be through nuclear reaction. That's what E=MCsquared means, energy=mass x the speed of light squared. That is the basis of a nuclear explosion. A great expulsion of energy would be required to send one forward in time, and a great gathering for you to pop out on the other end, or perhaps just something of equal mass from the future brought back. That is only possible in the case of an artificial wormhole though. I don't believe that parallel universes can exist in a similar state to ours, the chances are just too slim for two waves of existence to exist with the exact same set of physical law. In the end, I guess it wouldn't really matter if a specific point in time was heavier than another, as long as there exists a point in which equilibrium is reached again. In the end, the universe just have to the same total amount of mass and energy when the cycle starts again. This also is a possible explanation for Mole. When you go back in time, you already exist. The various compounds and nutrients that your body dissolved into are in the soil, and they don't go back again. It's like you were born a man with memories in 1666, died and became other particles, were born a baby in 1983 and left no particles in 2004.
-
09-06-2004, 04:16 AM #22Senior Member
Tralfaldamorian ideology
Hey, VOTE GHoSToKeR and I promise i'll install a new time-machine in every house by the year 2005
GHoSToKeR and the VOTE GHoSToKeR Party, including any affiliates, partners, employees, contributees, donators, random people who happened to tag along and their families and families friends, withhold the right to lie blatantly until you elect GHoSToKeR as President, at which point he will deny all and any claims of misleading the public, and consequently take legal action against any person, persons, party, parties, organizations, groups, clubs, or companies claiming that they were mislead, for defamation of character. 'GHoSToKeR', 'The VOTE GHoSToKeR Party', and 'The Easy Clamp Nipple Piercing' are Registered TradeMarks of The VOTE GHoSToKeR Party. Copyright 2004
-
09-06-2004, 04:21 AM #23OPSenior Member
Tralfaldamorian ideology
I shall indeed. How would I that on a write in ballot?
-
09-06-2004, 04:25 AM #24Senior Member
Tralfaldamorian ideology
All you need to do is go to
http://boards.cannabis.com/showthread.php?t=4797
I also promise that, when I become your president, I will make a forum on here where people can make up their own laws which will immediately come into affect, thereby giving me some extra time to watch cartoons and fall over in random places.
-
09-06-2004, 06:34 PM #25Senior Member
Tralfaldamorian ideology
except that the theory of E=MC2 had been disproved I thought?
-
09-06-2004, 06:36 PM #26Senior Member
Tralfaldamorian ideology
I don't think it's been disproved, at least not to my recollection
I remember seeing in the newspapers once, a story about a little kid, who was somewhere between 10 and 15, claiming to had disproved it... he later turned out to be wrong, so I dunno, maybe it's happened since..
-
09-06-2004, 07:43 PM #27OPSenior Member
Tralfaldamorian ideology
Either way a nuclear reaction is the result of converting sub-atomic particles into massive amounts of energy. I tried to make a reactor once, but I couldn't find Plutonium 231. Damn you Walmart and your lack of needed supplies!
-
09-06-2004, 08:18 PM #28Senior Member
Tralfaldamorian ideology
Originally Posted by zarathustra