Quote Originally Posted by Ap0c4lyPtIcF4t3
Im not against the point you are trying to make im against the way you try to get it across to people. You make it seem like you REALLY are one of those whacked out conspiracy people. Not to mention when someone provides a reasonable explination you then jump over to another argument, its like your running around in circles trying to defend your argument. Like I said, its all shady as hell and that WTC 7 was the most shady out of everything.

To me if it were all true then a plane was supposed to crash into the WTC7 building but didnt make it so they blew it anyway and made up a half assed excuse hoping that the panic would distract attention to it.....

Its something that you cant prove unless America takes a horridly drastic turn to this fascim that you talk about. Right now its up in the air, its not totally fascist but its more of walking the line. Time will tell so dont jump the guns on this one boys!
if this is directed at me:
1. if i "jump" to different arguements its not b/c i am dodging, i know the WTC 7 was random, but it IS relevant. The memo's, transcripts, cia operatives all those involved in the pentagon "crash" were most likely located in that building, and that is y i mentioned it [no hard copy of anything]
2. i never talk about fascism
3. anyone providing a "valid" explanation i would love to hear and i am not one to shut down explanations... especially if they make sense