5 slides of Pentagon Crash

[Ap0c4lyPtIcF4t3]

OMG WTF! THIS IS FROM THE FUTURE

OMG WTF LOOK AT ALL THOSE 6's OMG ITS BUSH HES TRYING TO GET ME OOMMFG

OMFG EXPLAIN THIS TO ME THEN! OMG!

[xblackdogx]

i do agree more evidence is needed to support it other than the same 'ol pictures... but its so hard to find evidence when uhhh the government took all of it.
anyone that doesnt know WTC 7 that was "pulled", i mean collapsed, was a MAJOR holder of CIA documents... hmmm

[Ap0c4lyPtIcF4t3]

Im not against the point you are trying to make im against the way you try to get it across to people. You make it seem like you REALLY are one of those whacked out conspiracy people. Not to mention when someone provides a reasonable explination you then jump over to another argument, its like your running around in circles trying to defend your argument. Like I said, its all shady as hell and that WTC 7 was the most shady out of everything.

To me if it were all true then a plane was supposed to crash into the WTC7 building but didnt make it so they blew it anyway and made up a half assed excuse hoping that the panic would distract attention to it.....

Its something that you cant prove unless America takes a horridly drastic turn to this fascim that you talk about. Right now its up in the air, its not totally fascist but its more of walking the line. Time will tell so dont jump the guns on this one boys!

[Ap0c4lyPtIcF4t3]

Look...I don't know all that much about politics..and I don't want to know...and I sure don't claim to be an expert on the Government or planes okay...I am interested in legalizing MJ!! Now explain since you want to repeat my original question to me..how do these planes help prohibit MJ?

You dont know much about politics and you dont want to know but you want to talk about activism and legalizing MJ.....leave it to a southerner to say something like this!

[xblackdogx]

Im not against the point you are trying to make im against the way you try to get it across to people. You make it seem like you REALLY are one of those whacked out conspiracy people. Not to mention when someone provides a reasonable explination you then jump over to another argument, its like your running around in circles trying to defend your argument. Like I said, its all shady as hell and that WTC 7 was the most shady out of everything.

To me if it were all true then a plane was supposed to crash into the WTC7 building but didnt make it so they blew it anyway and made up a half assed excuse hoping that the panic would distract attention to it.....

Its something that you cant prove unless America takes a horridly drastic turn to this fascim that you talk about. Right now its up in the air, its not totally fascist but its more of walking the line. Time will tell so dont jump the guns on this one boys!

if this is directed at me:
1. if i "jump" to different arguements its not b/c i am dodging, i know the WTC 7 was random, but it IS relevant. The memo's, transcripts, cia operatives all those involved in the pentagon "crash" were most likely located in that building, and that is y i mentioned it [no hard copy of anything]
2. i never talk about fascism
3. anyone providing a "valid" explanation i would love to hear and i am not one to shut down explanations... especially if they make sense

[Psycho4Bud]

the chances of making a phone call in 20,000 feet in the air is around 1%... and this one lady called TWICE ?????????

I beg to differ with you on that one!
Why would the FCC waste their time to decide whether or not cell phones should be permitted if they don't work in the first place?

http://www.caa.co.za/Public/Air%20Ra...lp0622-01.html
One of the most difficult aspects of a flight attendant's job is handling passengers who refuse to follow rules. "Please stow your carry-on, sir." "Fasten your seat belt, ma'am." "Sorry, but fingernail polish is flammable and should not be applied onboard." Having voiced these FAA mandates to those who weren't willing to comply, I've had my share of onboard confrontations. But the war of words seems at its worst when the subject turns to cell phones.

Recently I approached a businessman as our New York-Miami flight taxied toward the runway. Sitting in the first row of coach, he spoke loudly enough that passengers in the rear could hear details of his cellular conversation. Yes, he was annoying fellow fliers. And because the plane had left the gate, he was violating airline policy against cell-phone use on the ground. "Sir, will you please turn off your phone?" I said. He nodded his head in a way that suggested he would hang up when he was good and ready. I hovered above him, scrutinized by passengers eager to hear my next ploy.

I cleared my throat, and he looked up. "I'll be finished in a minute!" he said, aggravated by the intrusion. "Sir, you need to terminate your call now," I said. "It's airline policy" The man ignored me, prattling into his mobile phone unperturbed.

At this point I had three options:

1. Vociferously demand that he turn off his cell phone,

2. Inform the captain of the problem and possibly delay the flight or

3. Forget the whole thing, return to my jump seat and hope no one reports the indiscretion.

I stood there, amid a sea of upturned faces, weighing my options as the plane moved closer to takeoff . . .

Cellular phone usage aboard airplanes is proliferating. Before the departure of any given flight, no less than four or five passengers (sometimes 20 or more) will have a cell phone glued to one ear. On the ground, the decision to allow mobile calls is left to the discretion of individual airlines. But government regulations prohibit cell phone use in flight. Contrary to what most passengers believe, the Federal Communication Commission (the government agency that regulates telephone usage), not the FAA, imposed the in-flight ban on cell phones in 1991. According to a Wall Street Journal report, "the FCC was mainly concerned about (airborne) cell phones' potential to interfere with ground-to-ground cellular transmission."

Airlines tell passengers that cell phones can interfere with navigation and communications equipment in the cockpit. But a study commissioned by the FAA in 1996 failed to find a single instance in which equipment was affected by a wireless phone. Nevertheless, electricity from cellular phones can, in theory, interfere with aircraft systems. For this reason, Boeing and the FAA support the FCC ban.

Although many airplanes have public "air phones," passengers flinch at the fee of $6 per minute. (Airlines get a cut of the profits, which casts suspicion on why airlines want to keep cell phones turned off in the air.) Despite government regulation, or perhaps because of it, chatting above the clouds on a cell phone has proved irresistible for some. I've seen passengers hunkered in their seats, whispering into Nokias. I've watched frequent fliers scurry for a carry-on as muffled ringing emanates from within. Once, after the lavatory line grew to an unreasonable length, I knocked on the door. A guilt- ridden teenager emerged. She admitted that she'd been in there for half an hour, talking to her boyfriend on a cell phone.

These violators on U.S. airlines face harsh words and a fine. But cell-phone scofflaws on foreign airlines can face more serious consequences. In 1999, oil worker Neil Whitehouse refused to switch off his mobile phone on a British Airways flight. When a cabin attendant advised him to turn off the unit because it could interfere with navigation systems, Whitehouse replied, "Why? Are we going to get lost?" The captain arrived and told Whitehouse to hand over his phone. He refused. The 28-year-old was arrested upon landing and later sentenced to one year in prison. Last February, cell-phone abusers received yet another warning. This time it came from Saudi Arabia. Despite orders from the cabin crew to turn off his cell phone before takeoff, a Saudi passenger continued to chat away.

The man forced a 30-minute delay and was escorted from the plane by airport security. Later, a Saudi court sentenced him to 70 lashes. Moments before my New York-Miami flight rolled onto the runway, I looked down at the businessman who had refused to turn off his cell phone. Twice, I'd asked for compliance. Twice, my request was ignored. If we were in Saudi Arabia instead of New York, he might get 70 lashes. If we were governed by Britain's Civil Aviation Authority instead of the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, he might get a year behind bars. I advised the businessman of these facts, but to no avail. Then, in a voice loud enough for the planeload of passengers to hear, I told him that the aircraft would return to the gate and that although he would not receive lashes or a prison sentence, he might, however, cause his fellow passengers to miss their connections in Miami. That's when a hundred pairs of narrowed eyes turned on him. The businessman abruptly put away his cell phone and remained incommunicado for the duration of the flight.


Cell phone calls in flight?

Regulators eye revising rules to allow you to make, receive cellular calls on commercial flights.
December 9, 2004: 3:05 PM EST
By Chris Isidore, CNN/Money senior writer


http://money.cnn.com/2004/12/09/tech...ones_inflight/
NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - Federal regulators are set to begin discussions later this month on allowing the use of cell phones on commercial airline flights.

The Federal Communications Commission said that at its Dec. 15 meeting it will discuss possible revisions to rules prohibiting cell phone use on commercial flights. That's the first step of the process needed to lift the ban.

Cell phone use has been banned due to concerns about how it could affect an aircraft's navigation. And cell phones sometimes have trouble working when the plane is at cruising altitude because phone towers aren't built to project their signals that high.

[Ap0c4lyPtIcF4t3]

They are basing this no cell phone thing off their phony 9/11 movies and probably something else phony backing it up. Ive used a cell phone on the plane but was asked to turn it off. The cellphone towers transmit data to satellites and are only limited in how big the area is not how high. Just another thing that shows you shouldnt believe those stupid fucking 9/11 movies!

[Shelbay]

You dont know much about politics and you dont want to know but you want to talk about activism and legalizing MJ.....leave it to a southerner to say something like this!

You seem to be getting close to harrassing me on here..leave me be. I am on this forum trying to learn and I don't need your new sn distracting me from that...

[Shelbay]

True activists? So true activists are ones relating to MJ? So because you have no knowledge of planes it means that it isnt true activism....You ever heard of political activism ya southern hick! Have a good one!

Why don't you just leave me alone? Your not debating..all you are doing since the 3 days you've been under your new name is insult and divert..its NOT going to work for you okay...and don't forget to kiss my southern hick butt on your way out..AGAIN.

[Psycho4Bud]

and don't forget to kiss my southern hick butt on your way out..AGAIN.

Classic....I always say Norwegian ass!

Have a good one!:thumbsup: