Quote Originally Posted by mont974x4
LOL Except that Saddam DID have wmd and the burden of proof was on him to prove he didn't have them anymore...not ours to prove that he did. Not only did Saddam kill 100's of thousands of people he also supported other terrorists. Regardless of what you think of Bush and 9/11, those are the facts.
So you claim these as facts "Saddam DID have wmd". Oh, this is a fact? The statement that the burden of proof was on Saddam of proving that he didn't have WMD's is absurd. I would think that Saddam allowing weapons inspectors into his country and them saying there's no WMD's would be him meeting his "burden of proof". Weapons inspectors never found anything, and nearly all the weapons inspectors said there were no WMD's at all. Saddam didn't support other terrorists. But hey, the CIA created and funded the Taliban and Al'queda, just look it up. You're very misinformed, not even the government claims those to be facts, lol. "Saddam did have wmd's...those are the facts" lol, that's hilarious.