Bin Laden denies involvement with 9/11

[Psycho4Bud]

Ask yourself where is the plane at the Pentagon...

I believe that fire ball speaks for itself.

[Psycho4Bud]

Surely if something as big as a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon at the alleged speed, it would have destroyed that wall right on impact.

Aluminum doesn't hold up well to reinforced concrete.
And also...I JUST DON'T SEE ANY PLANE WRECKAGE EITHER!!.

Here's a pic for ya.

[Great Spirit]

I believe that fire ball speaks for itself.

Lol..still never answered the question which was "where is the plane wreckage at the Pentagon?"

Also, do you mind sharing with us why Building 7 at the WTC just mysteriously fell by demolitionms or as the owner said "we had to pull it"???????? Hmmm?????? Wouldn't they at least warn the people that it was about to be demolished????? Very strange that they would demolish a seperate building when the government is attacking their own people on the same day. Don't you agree??!!

[Psycho4Bud]

Lol..still never answered the question which was "where is the plane wreckage at the Pentagon?"

Enlarge the picture and you can see what is described as possible wreckage.

Also, do you mind sharing with us why Building 7 at the WTC just mysteriously fell by demolitionms or as the owner said "we had to pull it"???????? Hmmm?????? Wouldn't they at least warn the people that it was about to be demolished????? Very strange that they would demolish a seperate building when the government is attacking their own people on the same day. Don't you agree??!!

We've been over this. Pull the building meant to evacuate which answers your next question on warning the people of a collapse..not demolition.

[xblackdogx]

We've been over this. Pull the building meant to evacuate which answers your next question on warning the people of a collapse..not demolition.

if this was the case, why didn't they include it in the 9/11 Commission Report. was it not another collapse due to the attacks?

[Psycho4Bud]

if this was the case, why didn't they include it in the 9/11 Commission Report. was it not another collapse due to the attacks?

It wasn't a "target". I'm sure there was other destruction "due to the collapse" of the towers that wasn't mentioned in the report.

[Great Spirit]

We've been over this. Pull the building meant to evacuate which answers your next question on warning the people of a collapse..not demolition.

Son son son....you're using reverse psychology and avoiding the question again because I have you trapped. I will ask again....

Why did they "pull" Building 7 at the WTC when the USA was being attacked on the same day? Was there something wrong with it that could have been fixed? I mean, they really only demolish buildings to make way for new buildings and the public is generally aware that they will demolish it and they like to have parties and shit too! It does take a while to plan a demolition and its very suspicious to me that they would do it on 9/11.

So if you can answer this question for me...that would be great..mmmk!!

Oh by the way Psycho, it seems you've been having problems with your NSA reports. Yea...you see we're putting the new cover sheets on all of the NSA political dissident reports. Did you see the memo about this? So if you can do that, that would would be great...mmk?? And I'll make sure you get a copy of that memo..mmk! Thanks Psycho!

[Psycho4Bud]

Son son son....you're using reverse psychology and avoiding the question again because I have you trapped. I will ask again....

Don't understand this son crap but if it floats your boat..go for it!

Why did they "pull" Building 7 at the WTC when the USA was being attacked on the same day? Was there something wrong with it that could have been fixed? I mean, they really only demolish buildings to make way for new buildings and the public is generally aware that they will demolish it and they like to have parties and shit too! It does take a while to plan a demolition and its very suspicious to me that they would do it on 9/11.

The building was burning, people needed to be saved from the towers collapse, building 7 was holding over 250 gallons of fuel for the power station it was built over.

So if you can answer this question for me...that would be great..mmmk!!

Oh by the way Psycho, it seems you've been having problems with your NSA reports. Yea...you see we're putting the new cover sheets on all of the NSA political dissident reports. Did you see the memo about this? So if you can do that, that would would be great...mmk?? And I'll make sure you get a copy of that memo..mmk! Thanks Psycho!

Let me check my Norwegian Stompin Ass report.....nope....no new names to speak of!:thumbsup:

[Great Spirit]

Let me check my Norwegian Stompin Ass report.....nope....no new names to speak of!:thumbsup:

Building 7 was not fucken burning!!!!!!!! Are you just fucking dumb or something, or really an NSA agent??!!!

I give up on you...I really do. Here is a pic of Building 7 collapsing and a link to the video of it collapsing be detonators. IT WAS DONE ON PURPOSE!!!!!!

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...blecharges.htm

[Psycho4Bud]

Building 7 was not fucken burning!!!!!!!! Are you just fucking dumb or something, or really an NSA agent??!!!

You call me fucking dumb and state that building 7 wasn't even burning? LOL

I give up on you...I really do. Here is a pic of Building 7 collapsing and a link to the video of it collapsing be detonators. IT WAS DONE ON PURPOSE!!!!!!

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...blecharges.htm

I know this isn't as credible as Prisonplanet (LOL) but it'll have to do.

An Initial Microstructural Analysis of A36 Steel from WTC Building 7
http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM...rman-0112.html