100% Proof About 9/11

[eg420ne]

the video your directing me to is the one i posted

My bad- I saw it, but thought it merit more attention..

The most of the fuel from the planes burnt up on impact, every1 one saw that big ball of fire rolling out of the towers, and afterward, people were seen standing at the same spot the plane had hit...and if thats the case that jet fuel brought down the towers why did the south tower go down first and not the north tower that was hit first...

We are told that WTC 7 collapsed through fire, yet Larry Silverstein says the building was "pulled" (i.e. demolished). Videos of the collapse and other evidence shows that the building was indeed demolished. When and why was this building rigged for demolition?
Larry Silverstein, WTC 7,
and the 9/11 Demolition
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/cutter.html

[Oneironaut]

i'm sorry, i should have stated, jet fuel can burn at a MAXIMUM of 2000 deg... and i have no degree in science... but search 9/11 scholars, they have researched everything we are talking about. do you discredit their degrees?
http://911review.org/ScholarsforTruthabout911/
please entertain yourself with the articles written by PHD holders

Don't take anything someone says at face value just because they have a PhD. A lot of people with PhDs (you'd be surprised) have no idea what they're talking about. Just because someone has an education doesn't mean they're immune to believing really wacky things. In fact, sometimes it makes them more vulnerable to such things because they're smart enough to piece together a complex, scientific-sounding, convincing theory.

It so happens that PhD-holders often disagree about things, this being one of them. I'm not surprised you can find people with PhDs who agree with you, since you can find a few PhDs who believe in almost any idea...these people are human after all. However, you have to realize that most of them won't agree with you because the evidence just isn't there.

[Breukelen advocaat]

Few points to make ....First with the amount of fuel those planes have that fire burned hot and burned for a long time...Second skyscrapers are designed to collapse in on themselves

I was close to the WTC area on the morning of 9/11 - on the corner of Broadway and Rector Street, between Trinity Church and the Bank of New York.
Before the the buildings fell, an architect that I met on the subway going home told me exactly what was going to happen: that the WTCâ??s I and II were built to collapse straight down in the event of a disaster on the upper floors. This is exactly what happened when I arrived home and turned on the TV.

[xblackdogx]

Don't take anything someone says at face value just because they have a PhD. A lot of people with PhDs (you'd be surprised) have no idea what they're talking about. Just because someone has an education doesn't mean they're immune to believing really wacky things. In fact, sometimes it makes them more vulnerable to such things because they're smart enough to piece together a complex, scientific-sounding, convincing theory.

It so happens that PhD-holders often disagree about things, this being one of them. I'm not surprised you can find people with PhDs who agree with you, since you can find a few PhDs who believe in almost any idea...these people are human after all. However, you have to realize that most of them won't agree with you because the evidence just isn't there.

are you looking at the world with stevie wonder's glasses on? I'm not saying that b/c they have a PHD their theory is correct. What I want you to connect with is that if a person with a PHD in Physics tell you it is impossible for a building to collapse in the amount of time it did, with no outside force other than the "melting steel", than it's something you should take into strong consideration. and how is the evidence not there?; how much about 9/11 have you read?

[xblackdogx]

I was close to the WTC area on the morning of 9/11 - on the corner of Broadway and Rector Street, between Trinity Church and the Bank of New York.
Before the the buildings fell, an architect that I met on the subway going home told me exactly what was going to happen: that the WTCâ??s I and II were built to collapse straight down in the event of a disaster on the upper floors. This is exactly what happened when I arrived home and turned on the TV.

Was it the architect that designed the WTC... why dont you look up the testimony that he claimed after building the world trade center... i believe it is somewhere very close to the following: the buildings (wtc) are designed so that if a plane crashed into it, it would be as if you took a pen and stuck it through a mosquito net - [look it up]

[Breukelen advocaat]

are you looking at the world with stevie wonder's glasses on? I'm not saying that b/c they have a PHD their theory is correct. What I want you to connect with is that if a person with a PHD in Physics tell you it is impossible for a building to collapse in the amount of time it did, with no outside force other than the "melting steel", than it's something you should take into strong consideration. and how is the evidence not there?; how much about 9/11 have you read?

Was it the architect that designed the WTC... why dont you look up the testimony that he claimed after building the world trade center... i believe it is somewhere very close to the following: the buildings (wtc) are designed so that if a plane crashed into it, it would be as if you took a pen and stuck it through a mosquito net - [look it up]

Read my posting, above. You can "read" as much as you want by people that were not down there, but I was (there), the man (an architect) predicted what would happen, and he was right.

[king kong bong]

brainwashed....

[xblackdogx]

Read my posting, above. You can "read" as much as you want, but I was there, the man predicted what would happen, and he was right.

i believe i read you post above, as i f'n quoted you... my point is... how did the architecture know the design and layout of the buildings.. the main center pillar, the support beams... i think you should do the reading
-and i meant was it as a sarcastic ? (asking you if it was the architect that designed it) - if that was the confusion

[God v2.0]

Ive watched all the vids about 9/11 and i still think they collapsed because they were hit by a jet airliner full of fuel, its not like im taking some leap of faith and believing in something thats impossible.

Show me where it says that combusting jet fuel in an enclosed space can only reach a MAXIMUM of 2k degrees NO MATTER WHAT, it only has to go 33% above that and the integrity is compromised, also if a steel support beam is heated to 66% of its limit then dont you think the integrity and stability of that steel might just be a TINY BIT weakened? No thats impossible because no matter what steel stays super hard up to 2999 degrees right???? oh sure you make so much sense.

[Oneironaut]

are you looking at the world with stevie wonder's glasses on? I'm not saying that b/c they have a PHD their theory is correct. What I want you to connect with is that if a person with a PHD in Physics tell you it is impossible for a building to collapse in the amount of time it did, with no outside force other than the "melting steel", than it's something you should take into strong consideration. and how is the evidence not there?; how much about 9/11 have you read?

And I'm saying, you should also take into consideration that the vast majority of PhD holding physicists who have studied this say it is possible. I have read a lot about 9/11. I used to be a believer in the conspiracy theory myself and did quite a bit of reading and watching of videos. But then I decided to step outside the box and actually look at the other side. And it actually made sense. Let me ask you, how much time have you spent reading stuff by the majority of scientists who don't endorse the conspiracy theory?