Quote Originally Posted by Jimmicrackedcorn
We can only see 4% of the universe which is matter, 23% is postulated to be dark matter, which is invisible, and currently impossible to detect, and the remaining 73% is supposed to be dark energy in the form of vacuum fluctuations, which is also impossible to detect, to which there's a lot of controversy attached, because the only reason cosmologists hypothesize this, is because our most accurate description of the mechanism which controls the universe, is inadequate for supermassive structures, there simply isn't enough mass in the universe for the current theory to synchronize with the observations and measurements of the movements of galaxies and interstellar bodies.
The link between the diameter of the moon and the breaths is coincidential, because a mile is a ratio, used to measure a distance (you take the length of a piece of string, and ascribe to it a name, whatever the 'real' length is in cm, you could call it one, and measure everything to the string scale, and get accurate results) and the connection you state is lost when you convert the miles to metres, or the seconds to minutes etc, or another measurement scale (the sun's diameter will also loose its connection with the length of a day, as our standard length of time, the second, isn't a very accurate ratio with that which it was measured against, the obvious connection with the time of revolution of the earth on its axis, and the more recent, rigorously defined unit, the time needed for a cesium-133 atom to perform 9,192,631,770 complete oscillations, like the string analogy), and the brain uses about 10% of all neurons and synaptic gaps, at any one time, not just 10% of the total brain is used at all times, while the 90% is obsolete, it is all used interchangeably.
I think you meant to put astronomy at the begining, I used to get these mixed up quite a bit aswell, unless you're actually referring to the study of the planetary orbits, with regards to behaviour, and earthly incidences, like horoscopes etc. but that again is the same as the ratio, as it only appears like that from earth, and could never be transformed, when you apply the same principles to derive astrology, from another reference frame, like the relative nature of the second, metre, cm etc. could be as the principle of relativity states, this is the defining factor between astrology, astronomy, philosophy and science, as there roots, are closely intertwined.
I am certainly not disagreeing with you, I agree with a lot of what you said, and have got to praise you for how easy to understand ure post will be to someone who doesn't have ANY prior knowledge of science or religion, and how easily it will provoke there own ideas of the connectivity of everything (which is a skilful practice ), but the things I've stated above I've only told you because I believe you don't need to validate you're overall belief of the universe, with arbritary units, plus only 4% of the universe is visible, so there is no link (well there is but its a lot more technical than that, and so far unknown) between the diameter of the sun and the length of a day like in your example, other quantities will come in to it, like density and mass, relative speed blablabla, but the point is it is all connected, and very fucking odd, with an air of basic symmetry, underlined by chaos (chaos in the sense of mathematics, the indeterminate nature of an overall system, with determinable, defined components, i.e. the system appears to act randomly and on a whim, but it is governed by processes which contain no random parameters, so in this sense is deterministic, in that it has defined characteristics).

Your word analogies suffice in clearly showing that the processes that make you, you, and the experience of emotion you hold so dear to yourself, is somehow connected, and has the same basic principle, as the abstract waterfall careening over the side of a cliff, or the motions of the dots you see in the sky.
Excellent post man:thumbsup:
Im guessing where i got my information on the percentages is either incorrect or outdated.

I see what you are saying and now that i think about it, it is most likely coincidential but you know how it is when you are stoned

And yes that was the reason i posted this, to maybe spark some thought on the subject like it has for me! Its all very fasinating and i will post some more once im done deep frying some potstickers!!!!!!!!!