i have no problem with kids (when i say kids i mean roughly people age 13-17) smoking... but i am strongly against encouraging any drug use in a child... which i feel taking them to a headshop as a baby could have some strong outcomes on whether they get into drugs or not (if the habbit of taking them continues that is). if that kid doesn't get exposed to drugs, or does and just decides not to do them, good for them, we all know it's not the best road to go down, and the parents have to set the example since kids almost always are influenced by their parents...

in answer to your question, i think it's wrong to do that... because if it keeps up, eventually the kid is going to get wise to what all the pretty glass is used for and since his parents do it, he might feel he wants to do it too, as i said i'm strongly against encouraging kids to smoke... if i was the headshop owner or the worker on duty that day i would have refused service to both of them on sheer principal, what does it really say about the parents if they're too busy to go to the headshop on their own time (i.e. someone else has the kid) you can almost bet it also means they don't have the time to themselves to do said drugs