Results 21 to 25 of 25
-
08-26-2004, 07:45 PM #21Junior Member
Bongs vs. Joints
http://www.canorml.org/healthfacts/smokestudy.html
here is a snippet:
"Contrary to popular impression, waterpipes don't necessarily protect smokers from harmful tars in marijuana smoke, according to a study sponsored by California NORML (National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws) and MAPS (Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies). The reason is that waterpipes filter out proportionately more psychoactive THC than they do other tars, thereby requiring users to smoke more to reach their desired high. "
"The study focused on two key components of the smoke: (1) total solid particulates, or tars, which are noxious waste byproducts of burning leaf like those from tobacco; and (2) cannabinoids, the chemicals distinctive to marijuana, including its major psychoactive ingredient, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), and its two commonest chemical relatives, cannabinol (CBN) and cannabidiol (CBD), which are only weakly psychoactive but may have medical benefits."
"Surprisingly, the unfiltered joint outperformed all devices except the vaporizers, with a ratio of about 1 part cannabinoids to 13 parts tar. This disturbingly poor ratio may be explained by the low potency of the NIDA-supplied marijuana used in the study, which was around 2.3%.
Disappointingly, waterpipes performed uniformly worse than the unfiltered joint. The least bad waterpipe, the bong, produced 30% more tar per cannabinoids than the unfiltered joint. Ironically, the pipe with the electric mixer scored by far the worst of any device. This suggests that water filtration is actually counterproductive, apparently because water tends to absorb THC more readily than other, noxious tars."\"As your attorney I advise you to take a hit out of the little brown bottle in my briefcase.\" - Dr. Gonzo
-
08-26-2004, 07:55 PM #22Junior Member
Bongs vs. Joints
I just thought i would put that in there. I know I certainly hate saying something that's wrong and then finding out later that I was passing on incorrect info. i just wanted to help you guys out.
later,
Tacit\"As your attorney I advise you to take a hit out of the little brown bottle in my briefcase.\" - Dr. Gonzo
-
08-26-2004, 09:46 PM #23Senior Member
Bongs vs. Joints
Originally Posted by hUrB
-
08-26-2004, 11:06 PM #24Senior Member
Bongs vs. Joints
Joints rule...especially when you can just kick back and enjoy.
Hey, Cleve, I've got something you can smoke out of....(kidding, of course)
-
08-26-2004, 11:37 PM #25Senior Member
Bongs vs. Joints
yah man itz got alot ta do wit how u roll. if u roll tight, shez gunna burn slow but u dunt get az thick ov a hit. try rollin a cone wit the half that yer tokin on rolled tighter then the half that getz lit first. this will give u nice thick hitz all the way thru. i definatly prefer bongz becuz:takez longer ta smoke yer pile, u get a more potent high az sum1 else said b4, an im 2 blazed ta think ov anythin else but ya feel me. bluntz r also the shit.
PeAcE
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
Bongs Vs Joints
By Profane Motherfucker in forum Marijuana MethodsReplies: 1Last Post: 06-04-2007, 11:24 PM -
Bongs and Joints
By Miatch in forum Marijuana MethodsReplies: 17Last Post: 08-22-2006, 05:09 PM -
Joints, Bowls, or Bongs?
By Crosis in forum Marijuana MethodsReplies: 33Last Post: 05-21-2006, 04:36 AM -
Which Use More Weed: Joints or Bongs
By Profane Motherfucker in forum Marijuana MethodsReplies: 29Last Post: 08-05-2005, 04:12 PM -
Bongs or Joints
By steph in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 31Last Post: 04-30-2005, 07:21 PM