Advice please

[benagain]

Wish I had a kid. My friends kid is starting to get to that age where all he wants to do is hang out and play. Sometimes I'd give anything to have a kid to raise pass on my knowledge and experiances. It's a great thought to know that when I die, I may have someone else to carry on my spirit.

[nuggetgirl]

Here's my email [email protected]
Tell her if she don't want that baby to email me and she can bring it here and I'll take it.
Damn floosies, need to keep their legs shut if they don't want to get pregnant. Or damn, at least use a condom. Tell her she needs to get an HIV test too.
Being 26 years old, doesn't she know any better?

[Euphoric]

I know a lot of people who would of appreciated being aborted and even more whom i would have appreciated being aborted ^

[likemclever]

Your post wreaks of prejudice...

She should know who she opened her legs for...

OK cool ....maybe you should go down to the welfare office look arround the lobby and see how many dads you see waiting there with their children. I was there yesterday and I didn't see any.

If a single woman gets pregnant now days she better be prepaired to care for the child by herself......sad but true.

[altagid]

The point is to help her, and if possible the baby too, now, not to judge her or condemn - thats always easy! We all should have been smarter IMO luckily we mostly dont get punished for it.

[Breukelen advocaat]

No man should be forced to support a baby borne of a women that he did not have a contract, such as marriage, with.

The custody of children, in the case of a marriage breakup, should almost always go to the ex-husband. This way, less homes will break up - as is the case in Japan and Switzerland. If this society wasn't so retarded by religion, people could have their extra-marital affairs on the side, and maintain a home AT LEAST until their children are old enough. In the case of criminally abusive spouses, then there would be provisions and exceptions to these laws for the sake of the children.

Unwed mothers who cannot support their offspring, and when father is unwilling or unable to voluntarily do it, should be relieved of this problem and the children placed in well-run orphanages, or in the care of adoptive-orientated responsible couples. Patriarchal-based solutions are what we need in this society. We don't need a "village", as Hillary has advised. She's from the upper classes, and has no clue as to what poverty is like.

[benagain]

No man should be forced to support a baby borne of a women that he did not have a contract, such as marriage, with....

ummm what??
So what you're saying is a guy can stick his dick in anything he wants and not have to worry about the consiquences? Fuck it, let other people worry about it? That's just plain dumb. Now is the father is a wild monkey, then I could maybe understand, but if it's from a zoo, then his as is getting a job.

[Breukelen advocaat]

ummm what?? So what you're saying is a guy can stick his dick in anything he wants and not have to worry about the consiquences? Fuck it, let other people worry about it? That's just plain dumb. Now is the father is a wild monkey, then I could maybe understand, but if it's from a zoo, then his as is getting a job.

First of all, it takes TWO to tango. If a women does not take advantage of birth control, and if necessary as a last resort, abortion, then the decision to have the baby is hers.

Many men have been lied to by women, regarding their using birth control. Why should they have to pay?

Women in the U.S. simply have too much power, legally - and the men have no rights, and are significant financial supporters of women (through court ordered child support) that, in many cases, are often unfit parents.

If you are a man, you should support men's rights. If we keep going towards matriarchy, we go backwards. Our inventions, scientific and medical breakthroughs, better ways of life, etc., were made possible by a system of sex roles that worked better than those that are starting to re-introduce themselves.

I am in no way "religous" at all. It is not a question, to me, of "morality" - but doing what's best for an advanced society. We need to reintroduce the concept of "bastard" into this society - and make single-parenthood an undesirable thing. Hell, I'm asking that MEN be given the biggest financial burden, including primary responsibility for their families - but they MUST be given some rights in return. Right now, the situation sucks so bad that I'm eternally grateful that I didn't have kids with some baby-crazy nitwit.

[benagain]

Yes that's all a very nice opinion on what you beleive to be the truth. I was commenting on what you had said..

No man should be forced to support a baby borne of a women that he did not have a contract, such as marriage, with....

That I'm affraid is stupid. Maybe I didn't make myself clear. If a guy knocks up a girl and gets her pregnant, it is just as much his responsibility to care for that child and the well being of the mother as it is the girls. So what she didn't stick to her birth control, so what. You understand how a baby is made and you know what can happen when you have sex. Accept the consiquenses of your actions. Marriage and contracts have nothing at all to do with it. It's about doing the right thing as a man. If men behaved the way you describe, there wouldn't be any respectible fathers to raise any kids.

[tootsie roll]

In this day and age, with all the birth control options, it pisses me off when people can't be responsible. No reason in the world for so many "oopsies". And it pisses me off even more when I hear someone say that they're gonna keep having babies so they can keep getting more and more money from the TAXPAYERS WHO WORK FOR A DAMN LIVING. Fucking leeches of society and waste of skin.