Still think we're helping Iraq?

[Kid Dynamite]

the removal of saddam has just allowed the more violent extremists to run amok in the cities. In the coming months things can only only get worse for the people and the soldiers stationed there.

Kid Dynamite Reviewed by Kid Dynamite on 02-26-2006. Still think we're helping Iraq? its only a matter of time, probably http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11570947/site/newsweek/ :( we shouldve left them the fuck alone Rating: 5

[God v2.0]

I don't really care about the war on terror....I'm not against it either...I don't care if Saddam had Weapons o Mass Destruction...I'm glad they toppled him...He's a CUNT ... Even if the people of Irak hate the Yanks for they're invasion....They will be free of their corrupt oppressors...


And the Taliban can kiss my my ass...Now the're woman can show their face in public without being beaten

I would bet my life that Saddams Govt was just as corrupt as the US govt.

[eg420ne]

It Didnâ??t Work--the American objective in Iraq has failed. ---William F. Buckley

http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=246

[tadaa]

I would bet my life that Saddams Govt was just as corrupt as the US govt.

lmao

[monty python]

This whole war on terror thing is absurd. According to state department reports only about 700 people (including 40 Americans) are killed each year by "terrorists" - out of a world population of 6.5 billion. At that rate it will take the "terrorists" 50 years to kill as many people as the US has killed in 3 years in Iraq (30,000 innocent civilians).

The only reason of the war on terror is to make politicians like George Bush look good and of course all the military-industrial complex makes a ton of money. The average American just doesn't understand that he's far more likely to be killed in a car accident (40000 per year) or be killed by another American (20000) than to even see a terrorist.

How many people per year die from weapons of mass destruction, chemical weapons or biological weapons wielded by terrorists? Zero.

[lemonboy]

I would bet my life that Saddams Govt was just as corrupt as the US govt.

I doubt that but I would bet plenty of Iraqi's see it that way. Under a dictatorship not everyone suffers so you have this clash of people that are indeed worse-off now that it's gone.

[mrdevious]

I find myself rather displeased that the news stations only post the death count of American soldiers (that being about 2,380 or so right now). Besides the fact that the bush administration killed over 2,000 of the people they were supposed to protect, we never get to hear about the death toll from all the civilians and other nations troops. instead we watch CNN and see "2,380 troops dead now" and people don't think beyond that as the extent of the death. considering we keep seeing "187 civilians killed over a 3 day period" on a constant basis, a SHITLOAD more lives have been lost and that deserves some attention. Not to mention a lot of these war-supporters only consider the death toll, not the thousands and thousands of more people who come home with no arms, legs, or brain damage (head-trauma induced brain damage of troops is actually twice the rate of limb losses).

[Jeff Spicoli]

Originally Posted by God v2.0
I would bet my life that Saddams Govt was just as corrupt as the US govt.

dude, are you sure you know what you are talking about? lol