I'd like to know what logic you used to come up with the idea that you can get a animal high through second hand smoke. It's impossible for a person to get high from second hand smoke, or else drug tests would be useless. There was a princeton study done on this to solidify the accuracy of drug tests. I'll see if I can find the link but you would have to be in a extremely small confined area and have constant smoke coming in for, I believe it was 12 hours, to have marijuana show up on a drug test. So basically, you didn't get your cat high.