Results 1 to 4 of 4
Threaded View
-
02-22-2006, 05:37 AM #3
Senior Member
Supreme Court to hear Partial Birth Abortion Case
Originally Posted by amsterdam
I agree with you. It's one of the toughest calls I can think of. Yes it's her body however, there is no question, medically or ethically, that this is a fully developed baby that could survive outside the womb with little or no help from medicine. Any doctor will tell you that there is at least as much threat to the mother peforming this procedure as there would be performing a c section or even a natural delivery. So I have a hard time with the whole "saving the mothers life" aspect. And what really gets me is how if I were to accidentally hit this same woman with my car and kill her and her baby, I would be guilty of not one but two charges of manslaughter...yet the doctor and mother who make this choice are guilty of nothing? But my libertarian/anti-gov side says it iis a medical decision and should not be regulated by the government. Maybe I'm just too ignorant to comprehend such a high level of intellectual quandry. After all, I have trouble reading James Joyce. (how fucking high was that guy anyway?)
Similar Threads
-
NV - SUPREME COURT TOSSES DRUG CASE OVER ILLEGAL SEARCH
By Galaxy in forum LegalReplies: 1Last Post: 05-23-2009, 05:12 PM -
Californias supreme court Patrick Kelly Case
By Hypomaniac in forum LegalReplies: 0Last Post: 10-20-2008, 08:35 PM -
Supreme Court Backs Abortion Protesters
By amsterdam in forum PoliticsReplies: 2Last Post: 03-01-2006, 06:15 PM -
Supreme Court delivers blow to property rights; ruling in Conn. case has Toledo...
By pisshead in forum PoliticsReplies: 1Last Post: 08-07-2005, 06:22 PM -
audio interview...Shocking New Developments In Supreme Court vs. Homeowners Case
By pisshead in forum PoliticsReplies: 0Last Post: 06-26-2005, 03:57 PM










Register To Reply
Staff Online