Quote Originally Posted by TakeFlight
You are being hypocritical here, you say we know exactly where we came from and MOSTLY how it happened???
When I said I know exactly where we have come from, I mean where the atoms (heavier then He) in our bodies have come from. When I said how it happen I mean the steps from the Big Bang to where we are today, in other words the models and ideas that go along with the theory. We have proof of the big Bang, what could have been produced and from there we develop ideas of what could have happened and what we observe. Our theories are very closely related to observations, and that is how we know what has happened.

Quote Originally Posted by TakeFlight
...and then you spew out some scientific mumbo jumbo like you were programmed to do it and then you go on to say the origin of life is the only real fuzzy part.
Itā??s not ā??mumbo jumboā? just because you canā??t understand it. My hope was to expose you to certain ideas for you to look into. These are ones Iā??ve been exposed to and have had to deal with in theory and practice. It was mainly a quick history of the Universe (at least what I could remember off the top of my head.)

The origin of life is fuzzy (and yes so are a lot of other things but not as major as this one.) because we donā??t know how organic molecules could turn into RNA and DNA. Itā??s not that it will always be unknown, just unknown for now. Science takes time and patience.

Quote Originally Posted by TakeFlight
You contradict yourself multiple times ā?¦
Point it out then, because I fail to see where I have.

Quote Originally Posted by TakeFlight
Well the one flaw that really stands out is why this "evolutional" process has stopped or peakedā?¦ If we are still evolving then what are we evolving to?
It hasnā??t stopped or peaked (unless life ceases to exist somehow) evolution is continuous, but slow (in our time). It deals with the changes in genetics from many, many generations of species. The idea that is has direction is also a common misconception. It simply doesnā??t. The environment influences the characteristics that species have. The better the trait, the better the species has at chance for survival.

Quote Originally Posted by TakeFlight
if somethingt is unexplainable by science then wouldnt that mean that science isnt neccesarily accurate or all true?
I donā??t think you can say anything is unexplainable by science. By current methods it may be currently impossible. There are many tricks and other devices to find ways around obstacles that prevent us from knowing information. I forgot who it was, but an astronomer once said it would be impossible for us to ever know what stars were made out of, then a few years later absorption lines of elements were found in the Sun and it completely revolutionized the field.