Sheist, if you want to play the devils advocate then please let us know first. I always appreciate opposing viewpoints and would love to see how you got to the end of marijuana prohibition causing global anarchy. I fail to see how allowing it to compete for synthetic fuels and fibers and allowing cancer research would cause this. All it will do is switch more of our energy and timber economy to our farmers and land owners instead of oil corporations, timber barons and overseas governments. I ask you, without playing devils advocate, whether you agree with the end of prohibition or not? If so and considering all the societal damage you believe it would cause why would you want it to end?

This is exacly my point cannamail, this all ties into making sure that our elected officials are working for us and not for the money for their campaigns. As long as they go into office owing other people they will not and can not be working for us. However it has to start somewhere.

We need to take marijuana away from LEO's prohibition addiction. We need to allow research that could save the lives of the people we love. We need to be free to choose and follow any path we decide as long as it doesn't create too much harm to others. We need to end the extreme damage caused by these unjust and corrupt laws.