Would an Athiest be an Evolutionists?

[mrdevious]

All codes are therefore evidence of outside intelligence because someone must have assigned meaning to the letters or parts. There must also be an agreement between both the writer and the readers as to what is being communicated.

And right there is why intelligent design doesn't work, why it is utterly non-scientific. All ID is, is a proposed hypothesis for why life is so complex. And rather than actually providing one shred of proof that intelligence is behind the complexity of DNA, you simply work off why the other theories are incorrect. All these creationists and their "science" do is say "ok, here's why evolution is wrong, we don't have other theory's right now, so that proves ID is right". proving one theory wrong does not validate another theory.

Science is not saying "well look at it, something must have...." because that in itself isn't science, it's assumption. science works under the process of saying "ok, this is the way things are, here's a possible explanation, now lets find proof of this explanation", while creation uses a process of "ok, this is the way things are, here's a possible explanation, we don't have another proposal, so that makes ours right".

mrdevious Reviewed by mrdevious on 02-18-2006. Would an Athiest be an Evolutionists? "THOUGHTS ON EVOLUTION" Adapted from the book; Lifeâ??s Story by Mark Haville A coral reef is one of the worlds many interdependent eco-systems. An eco-system is an environment which contains a variety of life-forms that cannot survive without each other. Ultimately the whole earth is an eco-system delicately balanced to sustain life. A relationship where creatures depend on each other for survival is called symbiosis. Of course if different creatures depend on each other to stay alive now, Rating: 5