Guns

[m4ster chef]

Also do you think those people would have followed HItler had they not thought they could be part of his world dominating scheme. Would they have followed him had he not had the weapons that they thought were needed to conquer? Had he not had tanks? Had he not HAD GUNS? Now take that same scene, and put it in a world where all guns had been taken and destroyed and you have a recipe for disaster. When countries go to war, many times they make major advancements in their fighting and weaponry. Those advancments are WELL DOCUMENTED for later use. Lets say all guns are gone. They have technology and plans to make more.

m4ster chef Reviewed by m4ster chef on 02-13-2006. Guns Just wondering if anyone here in the UK owns a gun, not an airgun or anything, a handgun. Handguns were banned in 1997 after the Dunblane massacre, when Thomas Hamilton opened fire at a primary school leaving 16 children and their teacher dead. I have not seen one since (apart from in the US), Just wondering if anyone still owned one. The ban is so strict, the UK Olypmic Pistol team must practice in another country. The ban was pointless IMO because firearm use in crime has not Rating: 5

[tadaa]

Just trying to point out how ridiculous your own justifications are man... that's all. You said every precaution. Obviously that would just be stupid though right?

right.
:thumbsup:

No, my precautions are to save my life, going around killing people I would end up dead, so that's not the same thing.

[Polymirize]

In all fairness... did you take advantage of any of those scholarships M4sterChef?

[tadaa]

Prison has zero guns, according to you anti gun people that is the safest place to live.

[m4ster chef]

Us? who do you think you are dude? you can just go to hell with your other free spirited friends. I dont need guns for people like you. I only need a tape recorder to show YOU just how stupid YOU sound.

[Polymirize]

Prison has zero guns, according to you anti gun people that is the safest place to live.

Don't be stupid. Don't you think the 99% criminal population might have an effect?

[tadaa]

Don't be stupid. Don't you think the 99% criminal population might have an effect?

Well I thought you said that if there were no guns murder rates would drop?

Oh wait, lol, I forgot, you were wrong.

[m4ster chef]

Actually i did for a year, then i partied out, now im going back for a physical therapy degree or a forestry degree. My grandfather has a pretty nice forestry consulting business that i have an option to take over. I just really dont like some of what he has to do.

[m4ster chef]

If guns are gone murders just get more heinous. People use cinder blocks and pipes, knives and bats, hands and cans of chicken noodle soup. Yes anything can be used as a weapon in a murder.

[Polymirize]

Also do you think those people would have followed HItler had they not thought they could be part of his world dominating scheme. Would they have followed him had he not had the weapons that they thought were needed to conquer? Had he not had tanks? Had he not HAD GUNS? Now take that same scene, and put it in a world where all guns had been taken and destroyed and you have a recipe for disaster. When countries go to war, many times they make major advancements in their fighting and weaponry. Those advancments are WELL DOCUMENTED for later use. Lets say all guns are gone. They have technology and plans to make more.

A recipe for disaster? More disasterous than war? Oh wait, wars have been around longer than guns. So what you must mean is, a war in which we'd have to be face to face with the human adversary the whole time and couldn't simply push a button to blow up some village in Laos.

Sure, we have, as a species, made progress from our own desire for destruction. But maybe it's possible that we could make the same sort of progress through medicine, or some other science.