TOM CRUISE: War Of The Worlds

[StOneD.aS.FuK]

movie sucked. aliens were all cute looking. i cant stand dakota fanning.

thats that little bitch right?

yea she pissed me off to.

StOneD.aS.FuK Reviewed by StOneD.aS.FuK on 01-31-2006. TOM CRUISE: War Of The Worlds Next Wednesday, he is nominated for an award for his acting in War Of The Worlds. I didn't catch all of it, but I heard "Worst Actor Award". Rating: 5

[king kong bong]

thats that little bitch right?

yea she pissed me off to.

yep thats her. she makes my blood boil.

[StOneD.aS.FuK]

yep thats her. she makes my blood boil.

yea mine too, dressed in her slutty dress...cant act for shit. shes in so many fucking movies these days its not funny. and i wanted to fucking stop the movie when she wouldnt stop screaming in the car. i would of punched her in the face and threw her out!

[BaseRSX]

The movie was really bad but I donâ??t think it had anything to do with Tom Cruise. He was fine in it. This movie was bad because Spielberg half assed it. I'm sorry but Spielberg deserves ALL the blame for this movie being a total piece of crap!

He is capable of making great movies but he has also made a lot of really bad ones. Minority Report was another one of those. TERRIBLE MOVIE because of poor writing and direction. I wish Steven would just stop doing movies like these which are obviously designed to just be box office sellers and seriously shorted in the effort to make them actually good movies.

[Fabolous]

i heard about this on the radio "Bob and Tom"
and i think back, i can't really see why he was nominated for that.

i mean the wrost actor in the whole movie was that fucking annoying girl that would never shut the hell up.

as far as moive goes. it was intresting i think they moive people rushed things to fast, just like they did in "Day after tommorrow".
if they where to slow things down i think it would be much better

PS i am all agiest these awards, theres to many of them! theres like 20 a year for the stubidest stuff.

[bonsaiguy]

[QUOTE=Fabolous

PS i am all agiest these awards, theres to many of them! theres like 20 a year for the stubidest stuff.[/QUOTE]

I often wonder how they find time to make any movies since they seem to spend so much time giving themselves and each other awards.

[Az.]

eh i thought the ending wasnt its high point but i wouldent call it sucky, if you think about it, it is a real possible way that they could die.... think about the indians being killed off by small pox and what not when the pilgrams came to north america,



its waaaaaaaaaaaaaay better than that damn mel gibson signs movie where they die because water burns em.... that was LAME!

no no no
that was cool cause thats what happened in the original (the aliens dying).....i mieant AFTER that when they got back to the house at the very end! Cheesey Hollywood ending.....not gunna ruin it for people who haven't seen it yet...but the VERY last bit i thought "WHAT?!?!?!?!?!.....no way........"

[beachguy in thongs]

LMAO, I don't care about movies. Any special effect is better than I can do, so that's good. I'm not gonna kill anyone, so I don't mind "imagining" the freakiness of a murder, whatever the situation is. I like really freaky movies where someone dies. Or there's an unbelievably jaw-dropping actress. Or cool movies that bring a tear to your eye. I have no preferences when I feel like Roger Ebert. And I need to exercise.

[king kong bong]

i mean the wrost actor in the whole movie was that fucking annoying girl that would never shut the hell up.

seems everyone agrees about that lil bitch.

[robert42]

signs was better than war of the worlds story wise. signs was a realistic flick, thats what would really happen if aliens invaded. not all this action.

yea i feel u,

aliens would fight the war from gound cos they know we'd use nukes and ruin the world.