Quote Originally Posted by eddievanzant
If no one eats animals, we'd eat a hell of a lot more harvested shit, so that point is irrellevent.
that doesn't make the point irrelevant at all. it takes more "harvested shit" to feed one cow than the amount of beef that will be eaten by people. if everybody didn't eat meat, we'd save more because much more wheat would be spent on feeding cattle than feeding us. that's about as clear as I can make it.