BaseRSX, his point was that fractionally, not eating meat makes little difference to the amount of water we consumed. YOU KNEW THAT, yet you chose to make that post in biased.

I'm done arguing with this, so I will make one last list of points.

1) Eating animals is cruel to animals.
--I personally believe this video was made by a terrorist group named peta, but even if this wasn't, I'm willing to bet 100 bucks that MOST SLAUGHTERHOUSES ARE MORE HUMANE THAN BEING HUMAN. You do nothing your whole life, get all the food you want, then when you're at your prime, you get killed painlessly and don't have to suffer through old age.
2) Producing meat consumes way more water.
--First of all, who gives a shit? We'll ALWAYS have the same amount of water. Second, compared to all the water we normally consume, not eating meat affects the total number microscopically.
3)It's healthier to not eat meat.
--That is total bullshit and I refuse to even acknowledge that as a point by making a counterpoint.
4)Eating plants is less guilty.
--Eating wheat tortures more animals due to all the field mice n' rabbits that get their tiny bodies mangled up in machines and are left to rot.

If you eat only plants for specific health or religious reasons, I don't give a fuck; but if you think you are less guilty of cruelty to animals by eating plants, you are dead wrong.