Quote Originally Posted by FrenchInhale
You guys are crazy. If you think that the Bush Administration tortures every single child they get their hand on, then your crazy. All that the guy was saying was that if the situation arose (which it probably never did and never would) in which a child withheld information detrimental to the safety of the U.S. as a country (300 million people) , then they would have the authority to torture them. Think of it this way, if you had to choose between a nuclear bomb hitting a major city in whatever country you live in (which could be millions of people), or torturing a kid that had the conscience not to tell American officals the information they needed, which would you choose?
You are right, no one said that Bush and his cronies tortures every little kid, but your reasoning sounds rather Cardascian (See Star Trek DS9) to me. Why don't we torture you indstead?

And, if someone is gonna drop a nuclear bomb, better drop it on the city Bush is in at the time. Maybe he will visit Paris soon? :thumbsup:

Please explain to me what info a child is gonna have that is detrimental to the safety of the USA. So, yup it never will arise, but just the thought that lordbushit and his cronies have that kind of unchecked power is not right in my book.

Over to you psycho4bud!! :smokin: