many of those words are just as we see them. an adverb or pronoun is very loose. any describing word is shaped by wour past and present beliefs and experiences. to one person, good would be the end of death. but hitler was good. mussolini was good. aberham lincoln was bad. hitler was bad. charles manson was a genoious, charles manson was insane. its all about how you see the world around you, i see myself as perfectly sane, when i ahve been in the psychiatric hospital many times. thats one thing about most humans now days, they dont let others have their opinion.

i think drugs can be good, when others think they are absolute evil. just because a person sees something as good; or bad, as peaceful; or chaotic doesnt mean that it will be to you. these words are of deceit
flamingskullballs Reviewed by flamingskullballs on . Redefining words this might turn into a spiritual/philasophical debate, so be prepared for it to possibly be moved. are words concrete? are they set in stone? can a person truly (and logically) define a word in the complete opposite of it's previous deffenition? such concepts as good and evil, chaos and order, peace and harmony, i have seen these words to be so loosely defined, and improperly at that, the popular deffenitions are so concieted and ignorant, such as chaos, people most often Rating: 5