Evolution or God????. . . .

[MoonStarer420]

The main point is that no new information is added to the dna.

This statement proves how ignorant you are on this subject. DNA codes for proteins, these proteins build structures and these are seen as traits. Labs look diffrent then other dogs because they have diffrent DNA. But it's still close enough for them toreproduce with other kinds. Now try crossing a Chimp with a Bonobo and you wont get squat. This is because two diffrent species of apes were seperated by (I think it's the Congo) a river thus cutting off and genetic flow. Now enough time has passed that they have diverged into two diffrent species.

Macroevolution involves taking some simple matter and eventually evolve into something much more complex.

This is a complete misconception of how evolution works. Things don't necessarily have to evolve to become more complex. There is variation and mutations within a species and those better suited to their environment have a higher chance of survival. How can you say extinct species were less complex? That's bullshit. The Universe as a whole is complex and so was life as it started and evolved. Science is the only tool we can use to simplify it enough to understand it without losing sight of what may really be happening.

It would be like taking a normal skateboard and turning it into a helicopter. Tons of information must be added for this to happen, and it is simply not possible.

This analogy proves nothing, and we are all much stupider for reading this.