[QUOTE=Pyramidsonmars]
The god in a lot of peoples heads is one of a complete human nature. We cannot invent anything without putting a little bit of ourselves into it. The God of the bible claims to be the creator of everything. That is everything. The god in our heads is one that is completely subjective. Everyone's would be a little different if that were the case. If God is an all together real thing, than obviously there is a little bit of him in ourselves. God claims to be the perfect good, and therefore by observation we can see God when we see the good that exists in every person. Likewise we see a carnal nature; one that is sinful, and at a distance from God. This is where we observe the bent-goodness we know as "bad". My claim is that God is the most observed thing, something we are constantly striving for (whether we know it as "God" or simply the "things that please us" is due to our relationship with true goodness, or our bent-goodness due to sin-something that we indulge in but is entirely un-good) Everyone has caught themselves lying to themselves at one point, almost as if one part of them were trying to shut out the other. There is obviously some natural form of schizophrenia inside all of us, a moral truth, and a carnal nature battling it out in that which we know has human morality. This is the closest we get to observing the little piece of God that we have in us as individuals.
That's an imensly flawed argument. This is what's called "begging the question", in which the proposed conclusion is used as part of the explanation. you're claiming we've observed god through the nature of god within us, under the as-yet-to-be-proven assumption that the natural human state is the result of god-induced quality. There is no evidence to support that the nature of the human consciouness is the result of gods influence, other than the assumption that the claim of such conditions is true.