Quote Originally Posted by Pyramidsonmars
Dubois' find was not a complete specimen, as many are led to believe, but consisted merely of a skullcap, a femur, and three teeth. A 342 page report written shortly after the find throws much doubt upon the validity of this particular specimen. Despite this, the Java Man is still found in many textbooks today. A second Java Man was later discovered in the village of Sangiran, Central Java, 18km to the north of Solo. His remains, a skullcap of similar size to that found by Dubois, was discovered by Berlin-born paleontologist GHR von Koenigswald in 1936, as a direct result of excavations by Dubois in 1891.
that's straight from your link, thanks

That is exactly what I mean. If you're trying to determine this new find, and you, like Darwin, are doing it with the presupposition that "God has not created man, so can we say that humanity came from "X", and "X" has led us to believe that such and such is so and so, we could include that bias of our belief into our fallible human mind. That is where you have to look closely at the truth and what is absolute truthful, logical, and sensible when explaining this.