Quote Originally Posted by Pyramidsonmars
...assume...canopy of water above the earth at this time, and that "floodgates of the deep were opened" (water coming up from the ground-we still don't really know what's down there) that it would ammount to enough water to drown the whole earth.
When you assume your only allowed to make an Hypothisis. If you find evidence for these underground chambers, then I'd be more willing to accept theses ideas. If a lot of this water was in the atmosphere then Earth would have defenatly been a much much hotter place, for H20 is a Greenhouse gas and would absorb aserious amount of the Energy from the Sun. I guess I feel that many of the explanations (not only for this flood but for many other ideas from Creationists) lack qualitative models. All the places on the Web I've found give poor (and twisted for physics and Astronomy) answers. Not To mention I cant find a single puplished scintific paper anywhere. I mean where did all this water go? Back into the ground? It would have needed to be under pressure (or needed some other potential energy) in order to work against gravity to reach the surface. Then where would it have gone? back under water? Polar icecaps? There still seems to be many questions to be answered in order for this idea to be taken seriously.

Quote Originally Posted by Pyramidsonmars
as creationists are the only one's who believe it and therefore are the only one's who bother researching about it
I doupt this, many cultures from around the world (muiltiple sources) have incorperated a flood story into their cultures. So I don't deny it has happened but I seriously doupt it has happened to the magnitude of what you speak.

I mean were still talking only about biological evolution. It's only a part of the total evolution of our Universe. What about Hubbles constaint? The abundances of metals and Hydroden and the Big Bang? Fusion and nuclear synthesis inside of the Sun and their use to determine the age of globular clusters? The existance of Dark matter and Dark energy?
Evolution (of both the cosmos and biology) are very strongly supported by quantitative and obsrevational evidence. Not becuase Scientists want it that way but becuase the evidence points to it. Creationism will never be a solid theory because it depends on "God" who is not directly observable.

btw: " the last ice age ended about 10,000 years ago" Did yours happen 5999 years ago? Or did it happen during the 6 days? I don't know too much about the Bible.