Evolution or God????. . . .

[mont974x4]

The fossil record does not support evolution. There is no evidence of one species evolving into another species.

Carbon dating has also been proven to be inaccurate.


As to the Bible...there are more historical texts that were written by secular authors that support the Bible as a hostorically accurate manuscript. Archeological evidence keeps proving the Bibles history of man as true.


I do think that God created everything....but there was adaptation later. This occured within a species. No species has evolved into another species.

[Stoner Shadow Wolf]

i wish this thread would create or evolve an end, im tired of seeing this one get bumpped lol


lessee... god's supposed to be omnipotent, so that means even if everything started by creationism, it still evolved by far beyond the begining, humans were not the begining, and werent just *poof* created, but the origonal circumstances in the begining of time were likely creation.


and even then, that was an evolution of the mind and it's omnipotency, there really is no begining, just an endless fluxuation/evolution.

in the 'begining' and 'end' it's all one demensional, inbetween is just a massive chaotic evolution of thought, life, and personality.

[PureEvil760]

mrdevious - past present and future are all one therefore humans will always be around.

[mrdevious]

mrdevious - past present and future are all one therefore humans will always be around.

personally I can't say I've been a big proponent of the existence of time. however, there are methods through relativity in which "time" can be slowed and a person can move "forward", by slowing down the speed at which subatomic particles move through excellerated velocities beyond the speed of light. But anyway, are you speaking of the Chinese cyclical time frame? It's certainly not a proven theory that could be presented as fact, but it does have validity.

[bigp1612]

The fossil record does not support evolution. There is no evidence of one species evolving into another species.
Carbon dating has also been proven to be inaccurate.
As to the Bible...there are more historical texts that were written by secular authors that support the Bible as a hostorically accurate manuscript. Archeological evidence keeps proving the Bibles history of man as true.
I do think that God created everything....but there was adaptation later. This occured within a species. No species has evolved into another species.

You couldn't be more RIGHT!!!, and what a great topic....
Micro-Evolution is legit...its the evolution of species. Macroevolution on the other hand has no proof.

"Donâ??t mistake micro-evolution for Darwinian evolution. They are not related. When a Christian says they do not believe in evolution, it is not a reference to changes in specific traits. It is a reference to changes that require crossing the DNA limitations. When the facts stare evolutionists in the face, they are reduced to either insulting those who present the evidence or they must admit their world view doesnâ??t hold water." - Eddie Snipes

[beachguy in thongs]

So, you're saying God created Animals seperate from plants, or bacteria, or He created Man seperate from horses, or flowers?

[beachguy in thongs]

This was very interesting.
http://users.rcn.com/jkimball.ma.ult...peciation.html

[mont974x4]

I'm saying God created us all seperately. Animals of the earth, man, animals of the sea, and birds of the air. Then adpatation took over which gave us things like various breeds of dogs, for example, but only 1 type of dog was originally created.

[Myth1184]

I personally believe what I have seen!

There is actually Evidence that Evolution is accurate, fossils etc! I have yet to be shown any evidence that I believe that we all came from God in a Few Days! I mean, it's evidence against rumour!

There is no..I repeat NO evidence whatsoever to support the idea of Evolution (the view of evolution that we evolved from single cell organism)

[MoonStarer420]

There is no..I repeat NO evidence whatsoever to support the idea of Evolution (the view of evolution that we evolved from single cell organism)

Ha! There is evidence for the evolution of the Universe from the Big Bang to our current situation. Evolution is strongly supported by the entire scientific community because thatâ??s what the evidence points towards! Evidence? The cosmic microwave background, the age of globular clusters combined with their main sequence life time for nuclear burning, complete lack of blue giants in elliptical galaxies, the metal abundances in the Universe (my favorite part of this Universe is that our existence depended on the same process that is going on inside of our Sun. We are all made out of stellar ash from super novae).

I don't know as much about biological evolution but I do know that If one species is separated into different groups, so that no genetic material can pass from one group to the other, after time they will differ enough though mutations and variation to form 2 new species.

I don't understand how some creationist can accept variation and not evolution. If animals "change a little at a time" (though mutations and variation) given enough time they will develop into new animals. It has everything to do about genetics, not what you as a human classify the animals as.

If there was another model that could better explain what we observe then it would replace evolution. But nothing else even comes close. I've yet to hear either one piece of solid evidence to support any other theory or disprove evolution.