Results 1 to 3 of 3
Threaded View
-
12-22-2005, 05:38 PM #3
Senior Member
WARRANTLESS SURVEILLANCE(good summation)
The King's Red Herring
by Kristen Breitweiser
Recently, President Bush has admitted to carrying out surveillance on U.S. citizens in the interest of national security. He unabashedly admits to doing it. He offers no apologies. With his bellicose swagger, he once again uses 9/11 as his justification for breaking our constitutional laws. The President's justification of 9/11 to carry out such surveillance begs a closer examination. President Bush should be stopped in his tracks with regard to his use of 9/11 scare tactics to circumvent constitutional laws that are meant to protect U.S. citizens. His justification for doing so -- the inability to conduct surveillance on the 9/11 hijackers -- is a red herring. History will bear out the truth -- our intelligence agencies held a treasure trove of intelligence on the 9/11 hijackers, intelligence that was gathered through their initially unencumbered surveillance. President Bush should busy himself by investigating why that information was then stymied and not capitalized upon to stop the 9/11 attacks.
MOUSSAOUI, FISA, and FBI SURVEILLANCE -- MISUNDERSTANDING #1:
When it comes to the FBI and Zaccarias Moussaoui, one must understand that the FBI met all evidentiary standards to both apply for and be granted a FISA warrant. The information the FBI had to support their FISA request was two files on Moussaoui that were given to the FBI by the French and British intelligence services. Inexplicably, FBI lawyers and supervisors at FBI HQ "misunderstood" the evidentiary standards needed to apply for and receive a FISA warrant, and they refused the FISA request from the FBI agents in Minneapolis. Thus, the Moussaoui search warrant paperwork was never submitted to the FISA court. One need only read Colleen Rowley's memorandum to confirm these facts.
Had FBI HQ not denied the FISA request, the FISA court would have issued the search warrant to search Moussaoui's belongings. Whether gaining access to Moussaoui's belongings would have stopped the 9/11 attacks remains unknown at this time. Hopefully, Moussaoui's upcoming penalty phase hearing will reveal more information as to what the FBI/CIA/DOD/NSA already knew about Moussaoui during the summer of 2001 and whether getting the FISA warrant to search Moussaoui belongings would have even made a difference.
None of the FBI lawyers and/or supervisors responsible for this glaring error and "misjudgment" has been held accountable.
more...
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/1220-22.htm
Similar Threads
-
Obama Tops Bush in Warrantless Wiretaps
By Islandborn in forum PoliticsReplies: 25Last Post: 04-04-2010, 03:54 PM -
Bush Warrantless Wiretapping ruled illegal!!!
By eastbaygordo in forum PoliticsReplies: 0Last Post: 03-31-2010, 10:02 PM -
Feds Push For Warrantless Cell Phone Tracking
By headshake in forum PoliticsReplies: 4Last Post: 02-17-2010, 09:43 PM -
US 'to end warrantless wiretaps'
By HinduKush83 in forum PoliticsReplies: 8Last Post: 01-22-2007, 12:04 AM -
Right-Wing Reactions to the Warrantless Wiretapping Decision
By Great Spirit in forum PoliticsReplies: 0Last Post: 08-19-2006, 02:35 AM










Register To Reply
Staff Online