Whats more efficient

[JetFoi34]

it depends how you roll what you roll and how you use it

if we roll a nice blunt of some real good bud that blunt will last for a while and fuck me up
then use a nader ( http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm...endID=37616974 )
it will get you real high
on 1 gram in a blunt we can get like 4 or 5 people pretty blazed

i just think i get more ripped when smoking a blunt but then again i probably use a little more weed that a bowl idk im not even high nor did i smoke today and idk this post seems wierd to me

JetFoi34 Reviewed by JetFoi34 on 12-24-2005. Whats more efficient sup everyone, was just having a debate with my brother over which form of smoking weed is more efficient a blunt or a pipe? i am currious to me it seems some of your weed goes to waste when smoking a blunt as it continues to burn when no one is inhaling it? am i wrong in assuming this? is a blunt somehow a more efficient form of smoking than a pipe/bong ? thanks for any info Rating: 5

[jailer3000]

ya joints/blunts r very wasteful...but they r fun to roll and smoke when u got the weed to spare. if u really wanna conserve use a vaporizer.

[wutang123456]

holding a lighter on the flame makes you weed burn faster.

As its been stated many times before blunts are more effecient for large groups, pipes 2-3 people. You don't have sidestream on a pipe, but for the weight, there are less hits