Results 11 to 20 of 35
-
12-13-2005, 04:09 AM #11Senior Member
In the post-industrial age, there is no need to have so many children.
Originally Posted by Oneironaut
changin the problem of place... how stupid.. seriously
instead of spending BILLIONS of $$ to explorate space, they could alrdy have built thousands of way to make clean energy (eolian energy, hydroelctricity, solar energy) and they could erase poverty
i think this would be the solution
think about it man, then again its only my point of view :dance:
-
12-13-2005, 04:10 AM #12Senior Member
In the post-industrial age, there is no need to have so many children.
haha sounds like the Robots story -_-
-
12-13-2005, 04:14 AM #13Senior Member
In the post-industrial age, there is no need to have so many children.
Originally Posted by mellow mood
Originally Posted by mellow mood
Originally Posted by mellow mood
-
12-13-2005, 04:24 AM #14Senior Member
In the post-industrial age, there is no need to have so many children.
Originally Posted by mellow mood
As for poverty, that's not going away until capitalism does. As long as there is capitalism, there will be rich people and poor people. No amount of money can make poverty go away. Only socialism can do that.
We could easily provide food, shelter and medical care for every human being on Earth if we just stopped spending so much time, money and effort on building bombs, missiles and guns and put it into helping humanity instead. As the great Bill Hicks put it:
Here's what we can do to change the world, right now, to a better ride. Take all that money that we spend on weapons and defences each year and instead spend it feeding and clothing and educating the poor of the world, which it would many times over, not one human being excluded, and we could explore space, together, both inner and outer, forever, in peace.
-
12-13-2005, 04:29 AM #15Member
In the post-industrial age, there is no need to have so many children.
are u saying not to fuck? and have you got some latly
-
12-13-2005, 04:32 AM #16Senior Member
In the post-industrial age, there is no need to have so many children.
Originally Posted by potsmokersinceiwas9
-
12-13-2005, 04:33 AM #17Senior Member
In the post-industrial age, there is no need to have so many children.
but the process of making the children is so FUN
you are right though...if each couple on earth where to have only one child, the population would be halved in one generation...
-
12-13-2005, 04:47 AM #18OPSenior Member
In the post-industrial age, there is no need to have so many children.
There are more reasons the government has for not switching to other fuels... relations with other countries is a major reason for the oil dependencies. Also, many jobs and a great portion of the economy depend on oil. It would be a hard switch on the economy from fossil fuels to a less pollutant and more efficient fuel source, but what's the economy compared to the condition of the planet?
-
12-13-2005, 04:49 AM #19Senior Member
In the post-industrial age, there is no need to have so many children.
correct me if i'm wrong, but i heard the next baby boom will be in 2008-2009
-
12-13-2005, 04:52 AM #20OPSenior Member
In the post-industrial age, there is no need to have so many children.
More than likely when the soldiers from Iraq come home. Then is the baby boom.
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
Industrial Hemp - you may know and you may not
By GoldenGoblin in forum ConspiracyReplies: 1Last Post: 08-09-2007, 03:25 PM -
Industrial Purpose
By RastaKaze in forum Indoor GrowingReplies: 3Last Post: 10-13-2005, 03:53 PM -
Industrial Hemp
By Libertarian Toker in forum ActivismReplies: 13Last Post: 02-28-2005, 01:49 AM -
did I get conned into taking my piss test after the fact(post industrial injury)?
By healingdogdancer in forum Drug TestingReplies: 3Last Post: 10-12-2004, 08:00 PM -
did I get conned int taking my piss test after the fact(post industrial injury)?
By healingdogdancer in forum LegalReplies: 2Last Post: 10-05-2004, 03:44 AM