you had mention that you believe that i am being idealistic, and not realistic.
You suggest, or seem to suggest, that if a corporation/news magazine/ etc etc, were to use cannabis hemp as a source of paper that none, little to none would take them serious, stating such rhetoric like " i aint supporting no drugs at all", or something to that effect.
I would like to remind you, or to inform you, which ever it is, that all bibles up until the year 1900 were made of cannabis hemp paper. Now as i recall there was no problem among the population when it came to taking the bible seriously. I seem to be on the realistic side of this conversation. But what would you expect me to say? ;o)
Our flags were made of cannabis hemp and people take that seroius.
The word "Canvas" is actually an Arabic word, meaning cannabis hemp, and people take their canvas very serious.
Our military uses cannabis hemp in their shoes, boots and leather jackets, and people take the military serious.
Mercedes Benz , Toyota, and Chevy are incorporating cannabis hemp into their auots, and people take them serious.
I could go on and on, but with you being the realist here i think you get my point. With americans and others taking all of these examples of cannabis hemp being used in their everyday lives, why would time feel insecure about using it to print their magazine on? When compared to paper pulp from trees and paper pulp from cannabis hemp, cannabis hemp wins hands down in every category. Better to recycle. Easier to grow. Shorter growth time-table than trees, stronger, etc etc. It would be cost effecient for them to do so. Thats reality, not idealistic.
dai*ma