all im saying is that any way you cut it, time posting that article was a good thing.

but your looking at the situation idealistically, and not realistically.

ignorant american 1: "did you hear that time magazine uses paper made out of weed instead of trees?"
ignorant american 2: "no way? im not going to support marijuana and drug use, this is the last time i subscribe to them."

and even if that werent an issue, does it really make that big of a difference what kind of paper they use? i mean im aware of the wonderful attributes that hemp material has, but i gotta say... honestly.. i dont care. im sure if a hemp company made a marketable offer, and a nice presentation on the benefits of hemp over trees, then they might switch, but chances are no such thing has taken place.

time cant address all cannabis issues at one time, because even though i love ganj, there are much more important things happening in the word and in the medical field for them to report on.