If you didnt take my Sonnes advice go here:

[Schizferatu]

The BEST place for detox stuff, even hair follicle testing shampoo is Urine Luck .com

The Spectrum Labs periodically produce updated versions of their main additive product so the testing labs can't keep up. I once was smoking a J. and got called for a piss test right then - so my Sonnes wouldn't have enough time to work. I stuck a vial of urineluck in my boot and added it to the sample and passed the test with flying colors (of yellow)! :dance:

Schizferatu Reviewed by Schizferatu on 12-06-2005. If you didnt take my Sonnes advice go here: The BEST place for detox stuff, even hair follicle testing shampoo is Urine Luck .com The Spectrum Labs periodically produce updated versions of their main additive product so the testing labs can't keep up. I once was smoking a J. and got called for a piss test right then - so my Sonnes wouldn't have enough time to work. I stuck a vial of urineluck in my boot and added it to the sample and passed the test with flying colors (of yellow)! :dance: Rating: 5

[olboy]

Schizferatu can you tell anything you know about triple strenth vales, or quick tabs

[Schizferatu]

never tried either, srry

[Burnt Toast]

The UL additive is not effective on instant-type screens because the additive takes approximately 90 min to fully destroy all the toxins in the sample.
Then there is a false-positive issue surrounding screens and the UL additive: The UL additive breaks up the toxins in several pieces. The screens, being simple assay kits by design, will often recognize those broken up pieces as the entire THCA molecule. If a GC/MS lab test is done, the GC/MS, being sophisticated and much more accurate, would recognize that those broken up pieces are not true THCA, and would send the sample on as a "passing" status.
And theres more:
The UL additive requires 60-90 ml of sample to be able to work. If the additive is added to less than 60 ml, the test results would come back as "adulterated" for high chromates or an abnormal ph.

For these reasons, along with a whole lot more, I would highly recommend using a substituted sample, such as the Quick Fix urine, instead.

Besides if you are gonna go the bold route of sneaking something in, why couldnt it be something thats 100% effective for both screens and GC tests, such as the QF? It would surely be easier to pour in a substituted sample than fumbling around with 2 additive vials and the sample cup in the bathroom stall.

My two Lincs :rasta: